Tuesday, November 23, 2004

Disclaimer Stickers For Science Textbooks

The folks at Swarthmore.edu have come up with some disclaimers that you can print on stickers or just about anything. At least one of them is really used by the Cobb Co. (GA) school district. They also have some ideas on what to do about this shit.
If your children don't come home saying, "Evolution is totally cool!" then they are probably receiving science instruction from a teacher who doesn't think evolution is totally cool. Even if their teacher believes (as almost half of Americans do) that humans were created by a god within the last 10,000 years, his or her job is to teach evolution enthusiastically and without even a hint of tentativeness. Talk to your kids, and encourage them to ask questions during class. You might even ask your kid to record a few lectures on the iPod you foolishly bought for them. And at parent-teacher conferences, ask your kid's teacher to show you the lesson plans that specifically teach evolution (modules on descent with modification, natural selection, speciation, origin of life, human origins, etc.). All teachers will have a copy of the state science standards on or near their desks, and you can certainly ask to look at the "Life Sciences" section to see what material might show up on state achievement tests. Lesson plans teaching evolution can be found easily on the internet.

If you don't have time for any of the above, but are not opposed to being horrified and entertained at the same time (for free!), go get yourself a really stiff drink and check out some of the slick web sites where anti-evolution school board members, teachers, and fellow parents get their strategies, lesson plans, and Darwin jokes.

This page's URL is http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/textbookdisclaimers/index.htm. Please send it to any parents you know who might be concerned that their children are receiving weak or religion-infused science instruction.

If you have questions, comments, or non-exploding hate mail, please feel free to contact me: Colin Purrington.

Somebody is at least trying to do something to stop the schools' slide into the Dark Ages. Go read this. The stickers wouldn't copy, but are worth a look. Lotsa links, too.

But Will They Have A Catalog?

I couldn't pass this one up. From Steve Harvey of the LATimes:
The world of low finance: On Don Barrett's laradio.com site, Jerry Clark wrote: "Kmart, which had been in bankruptcy, just bought Sears. I have a suggestion for the name of the new company: Sears and No-bucks."

Life Imitates Art...Again

Last night, I caught the last half of the movie "The American President," which was released in 1995. While a romantic comedy, it offers some great perspectives on what the presidency should be and what, as American citizens, we should expect from a president or anyone serving in office.

I remember watching it for the first time in 1995 and thinking that the "real life" Republicans could never get as crazy and vicious as the Republicans in the movie, especially the character Bob Rumson, portrayed by Richard Dreyfus. Was I wrong or what?

This following quote, spoken by the movie's president, Andrew Shepard, is almost prescient; it's exactly how the Republicans ran their campaign, minus the part about the president's girlfriend (just substitute "liberal" or "elite" or "homosexual" or "trial lawyers"):

...

"And whatever your particular problem is, friend, I promise you, Bob Rumson is not the least bit interested in solving it. He is interested in two things and two things only: Making you afraid of it and telling you who's to blame for it. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections. You gather a group of middle-aged, middle-class, middle-income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family and American values and personal character. Then you have an old photo of the President's girlfriend. You scream about patriotism and you tell them she's to blame for their lot in life, you go on television and you call her a whore."

...

I would like to think that when the American public watches this film, they pause to think "Hmmm. Maybe the Republicans played us like a well-tuned piano." But I don't give the American public that much credit anymore.

As an aside, I'll be out of town from Wednesday to Saturday. I'll leave you in the good hands of The Fixer and Gordon.

The 'redemption' of NPS

Or, the beginning of The Interregnum. From ABC News:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 22, 2004 — In the aftermath of the November presidential election and talk of a Bush administration mandate, some people on the right of the political spectrum believe the government has a greater responsibility to heed their views. In some cases, that means changes in the images that define the nation — including those at some of the nation's most popular parks and monuments.

The film shows a number of marches with liberal themes like gay rights and abortion rights, intercut with older clips of historical figures like former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and Marian Anderson.

Then, one day the Rev. Lou Sheldon saw it.

"It showed only those liberal, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marches," said Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition.

Sheldon's influential Christian conservative group took their complaint to the government's top levels — "so they could reach down and work their system and cleanse in a proper manner and make it fair and balanced," he said.

Sheldon would like film of some conservative marches intercut in as well, though it is unclear that any major conservative marches have taken place at the Lincoln Memorial itself, which is the film's focus.

[. . .]



Read about Jesus-freak dickhead Lou Sheldon.

The Jesus-freaks have also badgered the government (Park Service) into offering a different explanation for the formation of the Grand Canyon:

[. . .]

Park bookstores at the Grand Canyon now sell the book "Grand Canyon: A Different View," which contradicts science, saying the Grand Canyon was formed by the great flood from the Bible story of Noah.

The book was written by a "born again" river guide who writes his view of the canyon's being millions of years old changed after he "met the Lord. Now, I have 'a different view' of the Canyon, which, according to a biblical time scale, can't possibly be more than about a few thousand years old."


My partner KR says it well:

[. . .]

I remember reading an interview with [author of The Handmaid's Tale Margaret] Atwood about that book, oh, say 10 years ago. She said that Canadians thought it was a nice story. Americans said, "How long do we have?" Well, folks, now we know how long. It's here. Welcome back to the Middle Ages.


Everyone should read the Foundation series by Isaac Asimov. This was predicted 50 years ago. He called it 'The Interregnum'.

Monday, November 22, 2004

Kill me

From Gallup via Pandagon:

Only about a third of Americans believe that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific theory that has been well supported by the evidence, while just as many say that it is just one of many theories and has not been supported by the evidence. The rest say they don't know enough to say. Forty-five percent of Americans also believe that God created human beings pretty much in their present form about 10,000 years ago. A third of Americans are biblical literalists who believe that the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word. [my emphasis]


I'm speechless.

End deliberate childlessness

From Jesus' General. He tells us about Bryce Christiansen of Southern Utah State University whose views on how we must "address cohabitation and casual divorce and deliberate childlessness". Another Winger wacko. The General gives some advice:

[. . .]

The third, ending deliberate childlessness, will be much harder to accomplish. Sure, we can pass laws to outlaw contraceptive devices, but the Godless masses will just employ natural contraception like the rhythm method and deviant practices involving the application of one's mouth to a little soldier, or in the case of the ladies, the elusive little sailor in the boat.

I say we test all newly married couples. If the wife is barren, we should require the couple to take on a handmaid. If she is able to conceive, then we give the couple a year to accomplish it, and if she fails to conceive in that time, we require the couple to adopt a frozen embryo-American.

But we can't stop there. Every womb is capable of at least a good ten years of nearly constant occupancy. "Ten years, ten kids" should be our goal.


I can imagine what Mrs. F would do if they told her she had to keep her womb occupied for 10 years, let alone telling her she'd have 10 rugrats running around forever. Somebody would have a foot in their ass.

I don't get these folks. I mean, I got nothing against a woman who wants to have 10 kids; have 20, more power to ya' but don't make me do the same thing. What in Hell ever happened to live and let live, as long as it's with consenting adults?

The End Of Innocence

On Nov. 22, 1963, President Kennedy was assassinated while riding in a motorcade in Dallas. Texas Gov. John B. Connally was seriously wounded. A suspect, Lee Harvey Oswald, was arrested. Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was sworn in as the 36th president of the United States.

This was when we started to realize the government and media didn't tell the truth.

Basketbrawl

By now you've all seen the video of the basketball melee. I wasn't gonna comment, but since it's been drummed into my consciousness over the past few days, I gotta say something.

Everybody's all surprised. 'Ooh, basketball isn't supposed to be violent', everybody says. To steal a phrase from one of my favorite blogs, 'are you effin' kidding me'? 80% of the players are street thugs whose only redeeming value is that they can put a ball through a hoop most of the time. If the NCAA weren't the money-grubbing organization it is, this riff raff would have been culled before they made it to their sophomore year.

Hello! Dickheads! College is supposed to teach maturity and respect, along with giving you an education. It's a time of growing for young people, not a minor league for football and basketball.

Instead, they promote these morons because they have a talent for a game. Money talks, ethics and values be damned. And who gives a fuck if any of these guys actually gets an EDUCATION? And then the NBA gives these guys millions. Incredible. It also doesn't help that half the fans are thugs too. My solution, install boards and glass, a la hockey. Cage the animals on the court and keep the fans in the stands. End of problem. I'm done now.

I should add that at least David Stern (NBA Commissioner) is handing out stiff suspensions. The problem is in the appeal. Let's hope he stands his ground against the players union.

Sunday, November 21, 2004

Guess Who's Coming for Dinner?

The Chimperor once again makes us proud overseas.

In'N'Out Urge

This isn't political, but it is regional. Bruce Van Dyke describes his longing for, quest, and ultimate satisfaction with a West Coast favorite that has just opened its first outlet in the Reno area. From the Reno News & Review.
I’d been putting it off now for a while. In fact, for too long. There is a time to procrastinate, certainly, but there is also a time to un-crastinate. I figured I’d better crastinate on down the road and go get me a god-dang In’N’Out burger.

Oh, I had heard the stories, fast becoming legend in this neck of the sagebrush pygmy forest. Stories of people waiting in line for two, three, even six hours to get their first taste of In’N’Out sin. People running out of gas while idling in the drive-thru, waiting overnight in motorhomes, and riding in on mopeds from Winnemucca, all for the chance to sample a good, cheap cheeseburger. Many things have changed in 21st century America. Fanatical burger love, though, holds on with effortless ease

Meanwhile, the walk-in option wasn’t much of an alternative for those in a hurry. Hungry carnivores were already spilling out that door and into the day. Back in drive-thru, I reached the second member of the crack In’N’Out drill team, who asked for my order. I stuck with the basics: burger, fries, lemonade. I remembered the instructions of an In’N’Out fanatic, who advised me to go with the “4 by 4,” classic INO insider lingo referring to a burger with four patties and four slices of cheese. Maybe some midnight after my next beer and bong poker party, I would dare to go with the 4 X 4. Perhaps the 5 X 5! But not today. I did forget, though, to order “animal style,” which means you want grilled onions on that burg. Damn. (Don’t look for these options on the menu. They aren’t there. It’s all part of the In’N’Out mystique, y’understand).

And you know what? The burger was good. Very good. The fries were decent, but nothing to inspire a rock opera. But the burger was cool. If only I had gone with the grilled onions

These are the best fast-food style burgers out West, bar none. The menu is limited, no chicken or salads here. Nothing frozen, everything fresh. Cheap 'n' good. Get some.

Oh, the title of this post? That's the way folks modify the In 'N' Out Burger bumper sticker before affixing it to their bumper. Be sure to visit their website.

Damn, I just made myself hungry! Maybe if I order a sack o'burgers from their website they'll come out the exit slot of my printer.....

Black Republicans

Genia:

Everytime I see a conservative blog praising a Black Republican, I laugh . . . and then I feel sick. Then I laugh some more. It's as if those conservatives are saying, "See! Even the niggahs get it!"

[. . .]

Intelligence reform

Crash and burn. From NYT.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a defeat for President Bush, rebellious House Republicans on Saturday derailed legislation to overhaul the nation's intelligence agencies along lines recommended by the Sept. 11 commission.

[. . .]

``The commander in chief in the middle of a war says he needs this bill to protect the American people,'' said Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., who led Democratic negotiators.

``Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House, and the blame for this failure is theirs alone,'' said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

[. . .]


I guess Joe Lieberman finally realizes which party he belongs to. The defeat of this bill was engineered by Rummy and his ilk over at DOD, and the new crowd at Langley, both of whom don't want to suborn their intelligence operations to a central authority. While there are some parts of the legislation that I don't like, we need some sort of reform. The Repubs had months to work on the language of the bill, why the objections as it's about to go to the floor for a vote? Did something change suddenly? You can't tell me it's just because of the provision to give driver licenses to illegal immigrants.

Speaking of shady deals yesterday, the Lame Ducks finally got the appropriations bill finished and the Repubs were hard at work:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 20 - Congress approved a $388 billion spending measure and left town on Saturday without completing a reorganization of the nation's intelligence agencies as a postelection session drew to a ragged close.

[. . .]

Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota, said he discovered a provision that would allow leaders of the House and Senate spending panels to designate people who would be given access to tax returns.

"Are we really going to pass legislation here that says an Appropriations Committee staffer can look at the individual tax returns of any American?" Mr. Conrad asked.

Senator Ted Stevens, Republican of Alaska and chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said that the provision had been added erroneously and that it would not become law even though the bill had already been passed by the House.

"It is absolutely a mistake, and I apologize to the Senate," Mr. Stevens said.

[. . .]


Yeah right, a mistake, that's it. Dickhead.

[. . .]

"Have you read this bill well enough to have confidence you know what is in it?" Representative Brian Baird, Democrat of Washington, asked his colleagues on the House floor.

House Democrats raised objections to language that would expand the rights of health care providers to refuse to perform abortions and abortion-related services. The Democratic minority leader, Nancy Pelosi of California, called it an "extraordinary sneak attack on women's rights and a disgraceful display of ideology over health."

But its Republican authors said the action was warranted to prevent government agencies from forcing health care providers who oppose abortion to perform the procedure or counsel women seeking abortions.

[. . .]


The Repubs never quit. They try and attach some sort of 'anti-legislation' on everything and try to slide it through under the radar. And while we're speaking of Ted Stevens:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 20 - Toward the bottom of the 16-inch stack of paper called the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 is a list of grants for communities in Alaska: $950,000 for a recreation center and $150,000 for a botanical garden in Anchorage, $300,000 for a senior center in Fairbanks, $1 million for housing upgrades in the Kenai Peninsula, $900,000 for an aquarium in Ketchikan, $525,000 for a quarry upgrade in Nome and many more.

No one on the outside knows for sure how grants for special projects like these - called earmarks in the Congressional lexicon and pork barrel by critics - got into the $388 billion spending bill that cleared Congress on Saturday. But it is a safe bet that Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska, in his final year as chairman of the Appropriations Committee, was responsible for most of these. [my emphasis]

[. . .]


This is the same guy who 'mistakenly' added the provision in the appropriations bill that would allow the opening of people's tax returns. Think all this pork for his home state was a mistake too? Neither do I.

Saturday, November 20, 2004

Tarawa

On 20 November 1943, the Second Marine Division assaulted Betio (BAY-shio) Island in the Tarawa Atoll of the Gilbert Islands, at that time a British Protectorate, located in the Central Pacific a little northwest of the point where the Equator crosses the International Dateline. Betio is two miles long by a half-mile wide, 291 acres, less than half the size of New York City's Central Park.

The object of the assault was a Japanese airfield which Admiral Nimitz felt would hinder the upcoming island-hopping campaign which would provide stepping stones toward Japan for airfields and supply bases. The island was heavily fortified. There were 2700 Rikusentai, Japanese Naval Infantry much like our Marines, 1000 Japanese construction workers, and 1200 Korean laborers. U.S. Intelligence calculated the number of personnel quite accurately by analyzing the number of privies in aerial reconnaisance photos.

The Japanese commander, Admiral Shibasaki, claimed that "a million men could not take Tarawa in a hundred years".

The Marines were to assault from the lagoon side of Betio rather than the seaward side, to avoid Japanese coastal guns sited in that direction. They would have to cross a reef to do so. The only maps available were U.S. Naval maps drawn by an expedition in 1841. Former British planters provided information about tides, crucial because the assault boats needed at least 3 1/2 feet of water over the reef to clear it. The Brits estimated 4 to 5 feet of depth at that time of year, but warned that they might be off by a foot or so due to unusual 'dodging' tides. U.S. planners went by the estimate and were dead ass wrong.

Prior to the assault, U.S. Navy ships and planes bombed and shelled Betio with 3000 tons of high explosives, or over ten tons per acre. Since the island was very flat, a lot of low-angle ordnance skipped off into the ocean. The Jap fortifications, some with walls eight feet thick, were damaged but their occupants survived and came out ready to fight. Their communications were disrupted, but the defending force was pretty much intact.

The first wave came ashore in amphibious tractors, 'Alligators', and the following waves came in Higgins boats. There was not enough water over the reef and the boats were stopped, so a shuttle began from the boats to the beach by returning Alligators. They had started with only 125 of these and almost half were knocked out in the first wave. The Japs had over 100 machine guns and several anti-boat guns facing the lagoon. Many Marines disembarked and waded ashore in chest-deep water for over 500 yards. Many were killed by Jap fire, and many stepped in holes and drowned.

Once ashore, the Marines were pinned down on the beach behind a log sea-wall. Radios were shot up or soaked. Command and control was lost due to casualties, units landing on the wrong part of the beach, general confusion, and the 'fog of war'. Finally, junior officers, NCO's, even buck privates, began to take charge, organizing small groups of men and assaulting over the sea-wall toward the airfield, which at one end was only 50 yards from the beach. The fighting was mostly with grenades, flamethrowers and demolition charges. The Japs had an extensive bunker system, interconnected by trenches and tunnels. It was slow, deadly work, one bunker at a time, each one supported by fires from others.

The highest point on Betio was a bombproof bunker. Marines gained its top at great cost. They threw grenades down the vent pipe and shot many Japs at point-blank range as they poured out the back doors. They dealt with survivors by pouring gasoline down the vents, followed by satchel charges. Later, they counted 200 charred corpses in the bombproof.

The assault force commander, Colonel David M. Shoup, who received the Medal Of Honor for this action and was the Commandant of the Marine Corps in the sixties when I was a Marine, at one point sent this message: "Casualties: many. Percentage dead: unknown. Combat efficiency: we are winning."

The battle raged for three days and Betio was declared secured after 76 hours. The Marines lost over 1000 KIA and 2300 WIA. 17 Japs and 123 Koreans survived out of 4900. It was the fiercest, most hard-fought and bloody battle the Marines had been in up to that time. Picture 15,000 armed men in half of Central Park, each trying to kill the other by whatever means, and you get the idea.

This was the first assault against a heavily fortified beach in the Pacific War. Many lessons were learned. Naval gunfire was modified to use high-angle fire which would come down on a target instead of skipping off. Pin-point fire was used instead of saturation fire. Combat swimmers were trained to gather intelligence about tides and beaches. It cost a lot of lives to learn these lessons, but many lives were later saved.

Ironically, the Jap fortifications that resulted in so many Marine casualties resulted from an earlier Marine success. In late 1942, Colonel Evans F. Carlson's 2d Raider Battalion had assaulted Makin Island which was in the Gilberts about 100 miles north of Betio. They kicked ass. Forewarned being forearmed, the Japs fortified the shit out of Betio.

The movie Gung Ho with Randolph Scott was the Hollywood version of the Makin raid, but does not mention the nine Marines who were inadvertently left behind and later beheaded. The Jap who did that was executed for it after the war and the bodies were only recovered a couple of years ago.

Today, the former Gilbert Islands are the independent Republic of Kiribati.

My source was: Time-Life series World War Two: Island fighting. You can read and see more at Tarawa on the Web.

Good . . . Very Good

Go see Oliver Willis and scroll through his site. He's made up a bunch of new Dem t-shirts that are outstanding.

Outrage

AMERICAblog via Atrios:

[. . .]

Where the hell is the Washington Post on all of this? Pay them the right price and they'll publish any crap, no matter how outrageous, no matter how wrong, no matter how hateful and obviously race-baiting (note that the fags in the publication are all white).

[. . .]


Read this, and then email the Post. The links are all here.

Housekeeping

You'll notice I finally got around to making the 'comments' work right (oldest to most recent or vice versa) and I took the time to get a little creative (opinions solicited). I updated shit over at TF&G too, since I had some time this morning. Check out Gordon's latest post over there while you're at it. If you're a hotrodder, biker, or enthusiast, his words will make you nostalgic.

Update:

I'll be starting my new novel Empires over at Creativity within the week. I put a link in the sidebar down on the left if you're interested in following along. I'll be using the title page as an index.

Paradigm shift?

NYT:

[. . .]

Steven Weisman of The Times reported that administration hawks were also talking about fresh intelligence on Iran's support for Hezbollah, which the world has known about for decades, and Iran's support for insurgents in Iraq, another old story. The hawks seem to be already starting to throw cold water on the prospects for a negotiated solution to the Iranian nuclear problem while trying to open the door to contemplating a military option. An administration official told The Times that Mr. Powell was trying to avoid meeting with the Iranian foreign minister at a conference both men are to attend in Egypt next week.

Small wonder, then, that the Europeans started to accuse Washington of trying to undermine diplomacy with Iran, just as the Bush administration thwarted their efforts to resume the U.N. inspections of Iraq - inspections that we now know had been highly effective.

Iran has long been a target of the hawks in the administration, who are undoubtedly feeling their oats after the election. But we hope that President Bush has learned enough from the Iraq adventure to understand the dangers of using flawed intelligence to create a false sense of urgency about a national security threat. [my emphasis]

[. . .]


I guess they recognize the Inept Administration's posturing now, since none of them (NYT, WaPo, others) had the nuts to call Bush on it during the buildup to Iraq. You hear the saber-rattling already, right? Do you think that ball-less Uncle Tom (Colin Powell) would have come out with the statement he did yesterday if Condi would have been credible floating that balloon?

[. . .]

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell thrust himself into the debate on Wednesday by commenting to reporters that fresh intelligence showed that Iran was "actively working" on a program to enable its missiles to carry nuclear bombs, a development he said "should be of concern to all parties."

[. . .]


People (even journalists) are starting to get it now, I hope. Bush & Co. are trading on what's left of Powell's credibility ('cause nobody trusts Bush's bed wench, CondoLIEzza), getting the issue out there in order to warm us up to the idea of taking military action against Iran. This is the same rhetoric we heard in the months before we invaded Iraq. Hey, what the hell? We got troops and bases right next door, right? No problem diverting some of them to Iran, right? That's the way people without a clue plan combat operations. Get used to it, we got another 4 years of this bullshit.

At least, the press is starting to ask the right questions instead of kneeling before Bush with their mouths open. Some of them anyway.

Pop!

The proverbial pin is looming ever closer to the housing bubble.

[. . .]

Greenspan took investors by surprise, saying that foreign appetite for U.S. assets would likely decline and clearly stated that those who were unprepared for higher interest rates were bound to get burned and were "desirous of losing money." [my emphasis]

[. . .]


Look for another round of home refinancing to lock in a fixed rate now and then wait for the foreclosures on those who can only afford a variable rate or whose credit wasn't good enough to qualify. When that starts happening, the wheels will come off the economic buggy quick enough. Watch 'moral values' go out the window when the faith-based economy tanks.

Saturday Cattle Dog Blogging



Sometimes, Cattle Dogs don't want their pictures taken.



Friday, November 19, 2004

Debts

How did we get in this mess?

Our current national debt, as of November 17, is $7,443,751,916,595.72.


Dwight at Wampum explains.