Friday, September 14, 2007

Surge 'n Stab

Good name for a cocktail, huh? Paul Krugman with today's 'must read':

To understand what’s really happening in Iraq, follow the oil money, which already knows that the surge has failed.

Now here’s the thing: Ray L. Hunt, the chief executive and president of Hunt Oil, is a close political ally of Mr. Bush. More than that, Mr. Hunt is a member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, a key oversight body.

Some commentators have expressed surprise at the fact that a businessman with very close ties to the White House is undermining U.S. policy. But that isn’t all that surprising, given this administration’s history. Remember, Halliburton was still signing business deals with Iran years after Mr. Bush declared Iran a member of the “axis of evil.”

No, what’s interesting about this deal is the fact that Mr. Hunt, thanks to his policy position, is presumably as well-informed about the actual state of affairs in Iraq as anyone in the business world can be. By putting his money into a deal with the Kurds, despite Baghdad’s disapproval, he’s essentially betting that the Iraqi government — which hasn’t met a single one of the major benchmarks Mr. Bush laid out in January — won’t get its act together. Indeed, he’s effectively betting against the survival of Iraq as a nation in any meaningful sense of the term.

The smart money, then, knows that the surge has failed, that the war is lost, and that Iraq is going the way of Yugoslavia. And I suspect that most people in the Bush administration — maybe even Mr. Bush himself — know this, too.

Shorter: Bush's bros are going around him and his failed policy to get theirs.

Here’s how I see it: At this point, Mr. Bush is looking forward to replaying the political aftermath of Vietnam, in which the right wing eventually achieved a rewriting of history that would have made George Orwell proud, convincing millions of Americans that our soldiers had victory in their grasp but were stabbed in the back by the peaceniks back home.

What all this means is that the next president, even as he or she tries to extricate us from Iraq — and prevent the country’s breakup from turning into a regional war — will have to deal with constant sniping from the people who lied us into an unnecessary war, then lost the war they started, but will never, ever, take responsibility for their failures.

Please read the rest. See also Dolchstoss Republicans.

Drawdown

Click to embiggen

This is why we'll never leave ...

Because you know we're only there for one reason:

BAGHDAD, Sept. 12 — A carefully constructed compromise on a draft law governing Iraq’s rich oil fields, agreed to in February after months of arduous talks among Iraqi political groups, appears to have collapsed. The apparent breakdown comes just as Congress and the White House are struggling to find evidence that there is progress toward reconciliation and a functioning government here.

...


Because, you know, the people of the region have seen how we've exploited them shared their oil for the last century. They've seen how our policies have empowered dictators and robber barons enlightened leaders to govern the region.

...

The oil law — which would govern how oil fields are developed and managed — is one of several benchmarks that the Bush administration has been pressing the Iraqis to meet as a sign that they are making headway toward creating an effective government.

...


Of course it's one of the demands benchmarks the Chimp has insisted on to assure Iraq is a 'democracy'. It's obvious as we see how big corporations suck the capital from our fleeting democracy make the standard of living in our model democracy so high.

Pay no attention to the demands for withdrawal. We're staying until we suck every drop of oil out from under the sand are assured the Iraqis have a working democracy so Halliburton, Exxon/Mobil the Iraqi people can experience how it feels to be fucked dry by the super rich who need more of our money to prolong their lifestyle the benefits of a democratic republic, just as we have over the past 6 years.

Fuck going home. The lives of our troops and innocent Iraqis mean nothing compared to the profits to be realized by stealing the oil are a small price to pay to assure an American hegemony freedom and democracy in the Middle East.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Petraeus tries to un-step on weenie...

An Offer He Couldn't Refuse?



Talking Points Memo:

Remember that unrehearsed flash of candor where Gen. Petraeus said he didn't know whether being in Iraq was making America safer? And then later he 'set the record straight'?

Joe Klein told Chris Matthews that he thought that during the recess in testimony Petraeus got an angry call from the White House telling him to set the record straight. Take a look ...

It sounds like this was an inference on Klein's part. But it sounds like a sound one.

No shit.

Holidays ...

Over to the in-laws for Rosh Hashanah. Happy New Year 5768.

Troop Reduction

Click to un-reduce


Via Slate.

The Ultimate GOP Scandal: Bush Caught In A 'Stall' With A Male Prostitute

SPR
Quit 'stalling'. Click it.


"Sounds like we'll be playing 'Taps' for a long, long time."

Can Rep. McHenry's Hostel for Strapping Young Republican Lads survive this?

Go read Jesus' General's letter to Mitch McConnell. Liquid alert.

I'm going to be blunt. By buying into the libislamunistfascist spin about Larry Craig being a homosexual, you are destroying the party's ability to retake the Senate for decades to come. Larry Craig is not a homosexual. He's told us that. He's just as heterosexual as you and Lindsey Graham. You shouldn't have tried to force him to resign. He deserved to be treated the same way you treated Sen. Vitter, who admitted to breaking the law by paying a harlot to change his diaper--that is to say, you should have given Sen. Craig your full support.

I understand that after hearing stories about Sen. Craig sucking anonymous little soldiers in restrooms across this great nation, it's easy to jump to the conclusion that he might be dancing with Dorothy. But think about it. Isn't it just as likely that this very heterosexual married man was looking for something his wife was unable to provide for him: a hot, throbbing slab of hard salami to swallow? We've all been there haven't we? We want something that our wives can't give, so we exercise our patriarchal privilege to get it elsewhere.

But now that you've adopted the Democratic frame that such behavior is homosexual in nature, you've jeopardized the careers of a lot of good, anti-homosexual politicians who are also rumored to be looking outside their marriage for a little sausage slurping action, good men like Sen. Lindsey Graham, Representatives David Dreier and Patrick McHenry, and even yourself.

Do we know if JC Christian is just Rude Pundit with his collar on backwards?

What all has Bush done in office you ask...

Go see the list of his accomplishments at Funny Cracker. It's longer than you might think, and it's good to see them all at once.

CentCom Speaks

Think Progress

In January, President Bush replaced Abizaid and Casey, who were “surge” skeptics, with Adm. William Fallon and Gen. David Petraeus. This week, Petraeus — in the first public hearings since taking on his new role — delivered his Iraq assessment to great media fanfare. But where was his boss, Admiral Fallon? Inter-Press Service suggests animosity between the two might be one reason for Fallon’s absence:

Fallon told Petraeus [in March] that he considered him to be “an ass-kissing little chickensh*t” and added, “I hate people like that”, the sources say. That remark reportedly came after Petraeus began the meeting by making remarks that Fallon interpreted as trying to ingratiate himself with a superior.


The Washington Post reported this weekend that there is an internal military debate, described as “Armageddon,” brewing between Petraeus and Fallon because the two men have “profoundly different views of the U.S. role in Iraq.”

It's rare to hear one Flag diss another one. I fuckin' love it! Go get 'em, Sailor!

In related news, rumor has it that Admiral Fallon will be transferred next week to command of the East River Garbage Scow Fleet...

Go read. Many links and quotes from Sen. Webb.

Spine, anyone?

Tristero looks at the Chimp's likely choice as the new AG nominee. Harry Reid is talking big, but personally, I think this nomination will follow the same script as the SCOTUS appointments:

...

Let me put it this way. While countrywide disgust with Bush, Bushism, and the low-brow pandering of Republican shtick is, perhaps, at an all-time high, one should never misunderestimate the Democrats' remarkable skill at pulling the rabbit of defeat out of the most victorious of hats (or something like that).

...


Indeed. One way or another, the next AG will be another in a line of thuggish, jackbooted, brownshirted, fascist administrators.

... If Olson is indeed the nominee, how he fares should be considered a decent harbinger for 2008. If they confirm him, hang on to that hat: It means that the top Dems have learned nothing and '08 is seriously up for grabs. But if the Dems can manage not merely to defeat Olson, but expose the extremism that he - and by extension, the Republican Party - embodies, well, that's a different story ...


T seems to have a bit of hope the Dems might be able to win one but if past performance is an indicator, I don't. Using the past as a guide, I think whoever gets the Chimp's nomination will be confirmed without much hubbub. I'm pretty much resigned to the status quo until the '08 elections are over.

[tinfoil hat]

By the way, you know when the next terror attack on U.S. soil will happen? In the time between Election and Inauguration Days next year. Think 'national emergency' and 'war powers'. Think President Cheney.

[/tinfoil hat]

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Idea for a 'Stocking Stuffers'!

Now, as I am considered 'in recovery' (12 years) I've not signed up for the local "Drinking Liberally" chapter. But look what the Idaho Falls chapter of 'Drinking Liberally' has come up with! There's even a little bit of a shop at Cafe Press. Coasters, doorhangers, etc. Whacha think?

craig-thumb.jpg

Quote of the Day

Shakes:

...

#@$*&^#&$*&#@$*&^#&$*&#@$*&^#&$*&!!!

...

Trench Warfare

John Ridley at HuffPo

The First World War was, of course, famous for trench warfare. A protracted stalemate rather than a series of decisive battles. The politicians and monarchs were mostly content to "let it bleed" rather than be innovate enough to bring the war to a military or diplomatic end.

We are once again in trench warfare.

Since the president's troop surge in Iraq began this past February, we have all waited like gimps in an infirmary for General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker to descend from Mount Iraq. Toting, we hoped, stone tablets with directives with which to lead us to the Promised Land.

No such luck.

Well, our men and women in uniform remain stuck in their trenches.

Petraeus says the 30,000 "surge" troops should stay in place until at least next July. Nearly 120,000 will remain in Iraq for the foreseeable future.

The foreseeable future being the next decade.

And the war goes on.

Settle in, folks. It's likely to be quite the wait before our Armistice day.

The First World War analogy is apt. That conflict was entirely unnecessary, a massive over-reaction to a single pistol shot.

It brought down empires and slaughtered an entire generation of young men. Over nothing. It also led directly to World War Two and what's going on in the Middle East today.

Got any ideas as to which 'empire' is going to fall this time? Over a buncha lies.

Imperial Autism

TomDispatch

To grasp the Petraeus moment, you really have to re-imagine official Washington as a set of drunks behind the wheels of so many SUVs tearing down a well-populated city avenue -- and all of them are on their cell phones. They hardly notice the bodies bouncing off the fenders. For them, the world is Washington-centered; all interests that matter are American ones. Nothing else exists, not really. Think of this as a form of imperial autism and the Petraeus moment as the way in which the White House and official Washington have, for a brief time, blotted out the world.

The world will still be there when if they ever sober up or run out of gas or hit a phone pole, but they're experts at ignoring reality. it's in their best interests, if not ours or the world's.

"...they stopped short of lying."

Slate

Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, and his fellow witness, Ambassador Ryan Crocker, did their best all day and yesterday to put the most hopeful face on the grimness before them. But, to their credit, they stopped short of lying (my em).

Wow. That's something new for this administration. I bet Bush hopes it ain't catchin'.

Republican Sen. John McCain, one of the committee's more hawkish members, asked Crocker what degree of confidence he had that the leaders of the Iraqi government will take the steps toward political reconciliation that they've promised to take.

Crocker hesitated, then replied, "My level of confidence is under control."

That's a very understated way of saying "They'll reconcile when pigs fly".

In one sense, today's hearings dealt President George W. Bush a harsh blow. Many of the senators' questions dealt with strategic issues, which Petraeus and Crocker—through no fault of their own—could not really answer to anyone's full satisfaction. Even the vast majority of Republican senators at least cocked their eyebrows.

Nearly all the senators seemed to recognize that the few, much-vaunted successes—especially in Anbar province, where Sunni tribes have joined with U.S. forces to defeat al-Qaida terrorists—have little to do with the main issues of this war: sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites and the failure of the central government to mediate, much less settle, those conflicts. As Richard Lugar, the foreign relations committee's ranking Republican put it, "The progress may be beside the point." The U.S. troops may be "like a farmer planting crops on flood plains."

Bush is certainly providing enough fertilizer, but the deluge is coming.

Tell us what you've been told to tell us, General...

Click to inflate

"I don't know, actually."

p m carpenter

As it turned out, there was some educational value in Gen. David Petraeus' testimony before Congress and the American people after all.

It seems he doesn't believe in his mission.

When asked yesterday by Republican Sen. John Warner if all the expense in American lives and treasure is "making America safer" -- which is, of course, presupposed as the objective of any military mission -- the general first hummed, hawed and outright dodged the question by musing about his current focus on "achiev[ing] our objectives in Iraq."

Undeterred, the senator put it to the general again: But is it making America safer?

To which the general said: "Sir, I don't know, actually."

With that, Petraeus not only wandered off the reservation, he bolted. One could almost hear the sundry and panicked hearts being clutched in the White House. The mask was off their #1 guy; their p.r. extravaganza was now a bare-faced debacle.

The Nation

Did General David Petraeus today suggest that the war in Iraq may not make the United States safer?

Petraeus replied, "I don't know, actually. I have not sat down and sorted in my own mind."

Don't know? Is it possible that the war is not making the United States safer? Petraeus went on to note that he has "taken into account" the war's impact on the U.S. military and that it's his job to recommend to the president the best course for reaching "the objectives of the policy" in Iraq. Yet he did not say that the Iraq war is essential to the national security of the United States. Warner did not press the general any further on this point. The senator's time was up.

That was quite a statement from the fellow who is supposed to save Bush's war. He advocates pursuing Bush's course of action in Iraq but he cannot attest that this effort is crucial for America's safety. Is that being a good soldier?

If he's nothing else, General Petraeus is a good soldier. Soldiers follow orders, whether they like them or not, for good or for ill. Petraeus has been ordered to put lipstick on Bush's pig and he's doing it rather well.

When pressed, a good soldier will tell the truth, even when it puts a tiny crack in the propaganda he's been ordered to spew in support of his masters' delusions. A worse hack would have answered the question with a slightly different 'four words': "Of course it is!"

I've seen the massive rear fender on a Harley-Davidson fall off because a tiny, nearly invisible crack was left unchecked and allowed to propagate.

It remains to be seen what will happen because of Petraeus' comment, but some of the pundits have already picked it up and are trying to run with it. I can only imagine that the Chimp ain't none too happy about this and will do his best to 'stop-drill' it, something along the lines of, "The general fights wars and does my military bidding. I'll tell you when you're safe."

I hope the crack spreads and Bush's ass falls off and gets drop-kicked through the goalpost of truth.

I may have just set a new standard for mixed metaphors with a motorcycle/sports/Bush's ass one. Heh.

Location, location, location...

Mrs. F's company pays $2.6 mil per floor (they occupy the top two of the Merrill Lynch Building) per year in rent. Some of the rents in WTC were twice that. That's why we're gonna have the Freedom Tower soon enough. - Fixer in comments on yesterday's post


Anna Quindlen riffs on Fixer's comment:

It's all there at the construction site. Tourists peer through the fence, but it's hard to understand what they think they're seeing. Everything that once spoke of the magnitude of the events of September 11 is gone. As much as its jagged smoking ruins were once a symbol for unparalleled disaster, now its bland expanse is a symbol of how narrow and parsimonious the long-term response has been. It's business as usual there, except for one small section of the fence with a listing of the names of those who died in letters so small that you almost have to squint to read them. Remember how we said we would never forget them? We forgot them. If the spirit of the day had prevailed, the sense that this was a moment like no other and demanded a gesture in kind, someone would have had the guts to leave this national graveyard solemn, empty and still. Instead there is a sign there that says that the job now is "to recover the 10 million-sq. feet of commercial space lost in the attacks." How American. It's all about the real estate.

Yep.

They work for us ...

TRex makes the case for term limits, which I heartily endorse:

...

Stevens and Lieberman and Craig are all pretty sterling arguments for senatorial term limits if you ask me. Letting those old farts moulder in place for thirty-plus years hasn’t done them or the nation any goddamn good at all, frankly. And if we can’t get term limits, can we at least get a minimum competency test? Ugly and old is fine for a Senate position, but I think we can all agree that “senile, belligerent, and delusional” should disqualify them from higher office.

...


Like I always say, elected office is a calling, not a career. To many of 'em lose touch with those whom they are supposed to be representing, protecting big campaign contributors at the expense of their constituency. 2 terms for Senators, 6 terms for Representatives should be the rule, not a pipe dream.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

3-Day Wait For Hallucinations

Raw Story

A new proposal from the mayor of Amsterdam is sure to be considered a bummer by certain visitors to the Dutch city: a three-day waiting period to buy hallucinogenic mushrooms.

Like, bummer, dude. Dutch heads gotta plan ahead now. Good luck.

Mayor Job Cohen wants to require the wait period to allow mushroom buyers to fully understand exactly what it is they are purchasing, ANP news agency reported Tuesday.

Yo, Job, they know.

I ate some of them things once at a bluegrass concert at San Diego Wild Animal Park. Rode on an elephant. It was way cool.

Then the sun went down and all the nocturnal animals, big cats mostly, started sounding off. That was really cool, but I had to keep reminding my friends that the animals weren't coming for them. Heh.

The 130-mile drive home afterwards must have been interesting. I don't remember. I was driving.

Bin Laden's Bobbed Black Beard Baffles Boob

Times of India

WASHINGTON: Osama bin Laden's beard seen in a new video tape featuring the Al-Qaeda supremo has baffled the top US spy.

It's hair growing out of his face, you fucking idiot.

September 11: What You "Ought Not To Know"

Greg Palast with today's 'must read':

On November 9, 2001, when you could still choke on the dust in the air near Ground Zero, BBC Television received a call in London from a top-level US intelligence agent. He was not happy. Shortly after George W. Bush took office, he told us reluctantly, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the FBI, “were told to back off the Saudis.”

Before you jump to the wrong conclusion, let me tell you that we found no evidence — none, zero, no kidding — that George Bush knew about Al Qaeda’s plan to attack on September 11. Indeed, the grim joke at BBC is that anyone accusing George Bush of knowing anything at all must have solid evidence (my em). This is not a story of what George Bush knew but rather of his very-unfunny ignorance. And it was not stupidity, but policy: no asking Saudis uncomfortable questions about their paying off roving packs of killers, especially when those Saudis are so generous to Bush family businesses.

Yes, Bill Clinton was also a bit too tender toward the oil men of Arabia. But this you should know: In his last year in office, Clinton sent two delegations to the Gulf to suggest that the Royal family crack down on “charitable donations” from their kingdom to the guys who blew up our embassies.

But when a failed Texas oil man took over the White House in January 2001, demands on the Saudis to cut off terror funding simply stopped.

Why now this belated move on the bin Laden’s former operation? Why not right after the September 11 attack? This year’s FBI raid occurred just days after an Islamist terror assault in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Apparently, messin’ with the oil sheiks gets this Administration’s attention. Falling towers in New York are only for Republican convention photo ops.

The 199-I memo was passed to BBC television by the gumshoes at the National Security News Service in Washington. We authenticated it, added in our own sleuthing, then gave the FBI its say, expecting the usual, “It’s baloney, a fake.” But we didn’t get the usual response. Rather, FBI headquarters said, “There are lots of things the intelligence community knows and other people ought not to know.”

Ought not to know?

What else ought we not to know, Mr. President? And when are we supposed to forget it?

I'm angry enough at this that I dare not comment any further.

Bark, woof, whinny-whinny, neigh-neigh

Click for an even bigger pair of road apples

Here's what some folks are sayimg about General Petraeus' appearance before Congress:

Ray McGovern, a good one to read:

"Swear Him In"

That's all I said in the unusual silence on Monday afternoon as first aid was being administered to Gen. David Petraeus's microphone before he spoke before the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs Committees.

It had dawned on me when House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Missouri) invited Gen. Petraeus to make his presentation, Skelton forgot to ask him to take the customary oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I had no idea my suggestion would be enough to get me thrown out of he hearing.

TPM Election Central

Bottom line: The public appears to have decided that Petraeus won't tell them the truth about Iraq, that they want out of Iraq no matter what he says, and that the President won't change course in the wake of his testimony. Clever public.

Like it matters what us pissants think.

Tony Peyser

Let’s frame this in a way
That’s easy to remember:
What the general means is
Spring is the new September.

Eugene Robinson

The next six months in Iraq are crucial -- and always will be. [...]

That's pretty much it. Petraeus is selling a product he has a stake in, and doing a damn good job of it. He will get Bush And His Iraq Clusterfuck another Friedman Unit per his orders to that effect, and, oh yeah, Super-Size it. FUs are getting longer so they don't have to do this song and dance every six months. Once more oughta do it for Bush's term.

The concern that comes to mind is this: as these reports get rosier and rosier, what if Bush thinks that he's the only one who can get the oil carry out the Iraq 'mission' (as in missionary), that no succeeding Repuglicant president can do it, and for damn sure no Democrat ever could, and just decides to stay King until he can do it? He can't, of course.

We're in Iraq full force until at least 1/09. Period. The best we can hope for is that Bush and Cheney die before then.

Counterpoint ...

To JG's "Then", my "Now". The Towers would be directly behind the World Financial Center in this view. By the way, Mrs. F's office is on the top floor of the building with the dome.


Taken from MS Noordam. Click to embiggen.


May they rest in peace ... sooner rather than later.

Betrayed

Yesterday, in front of Congress, we saw the American people, the troops, and the Constitution betrayed by the commanding general in Iraq. I won't bother picking apart what he said, the lies he spread, but suffice it to say the truth never entered the room yesterday. Glenn Greenwald says it best:

...

It is actually amazing to watch media coverage of Gen. Petraeus' testimony depict him as though he has just risen from the apolitical ether as the objective and trustworthy source with regard to the war. The White House is desperate for that image to be maintained because the nation no longer trusts George Bush or Dick Cheney or other Republican office-holders, precisely because they have heard from those individuals over the last several years countless assurances of "progress," only for events repeatedly to prove those claims to be untrue.

...


On this sixth anniversary of September 11th, nothing has changed. We are not safer, our government still lies to us, and thousands of Americans are still being killed and maimed.

The sad part is we will be stuck with this until at least January 2009.

9.11.2007.New.York.State.of.Mind

New York State of Mind
Click image to view larger version.

Peace!
JG.


Cross posted at: Jersey Guy

Monday, September 10, 2007

The 'Surge Report'


Dog and Pony Show courtesy of FDL.

Quote of the Day and then some...

From Think Progress, a comment on the post about David Brooks trying to associate bin Laden with Liberals:

From Bush to Brooks, Osama bin Laden knows how to play his useful idiots.

Note to Brooks et al: OBL's a lot more symbiotically useful to you wingnuts than he is to us, which is why you haven't pursued him like you should have. You're the ones who turned his sucker punch on us into an excuse to abrogate the Constitution and plunge the United States into international criminality. Go fuck yourself. And that Texas mule you rode in on.

Update:

Robert Parry

Just as Sylvester and Tweety Bird achieved lasting Hollywood fame from their comical cartoon chases, the less amusing duo of George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden continue to benefit each other by reviving their long-distance rivalry, one posturing against the other in a way that helps them both.

“The vast majority of you [Americans] want it [the Iraq War] stopped,” bin Laden said. “Thus you elected the Democratic Party for this purpose, but the Democrats haven't made a move worth mentioning.”

That means if the Democrats do renew their efforts toward forcing American troop withdrawals, Bush and his supporters can simply accuse the Democrats of following bin Laden’s orders or playing into bin Laden’s hands.

The reality may be the opposite, but a few Republican floor speeches and a couple of well-placed op-eds should be enough to spook the already nervous Democrats.

In other words, any similarity in language between bin Laden and what many Americans say in common conversations will be used to discredit them. They will become bin Laden’s fellow travelers.

All the better to get Bush and bin Laden what they both really want: a prolonged war in Iraq – and possibly a U.S. attack on the Shiite government of Iran.

There you have it.

Janis Martin 1940-2007

LATimes

Janis Martin, a teenage rockabilly sensation of the 1950s who was billed as "the female Elvis," died Sept. 3 of cancer at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C. She was 67.

I was pretty young way back then, but I liked Rockabilly. Still do. I probably heard her sing, but I was never really conscious of Ms. Martin until recently, when I saw a TV show about "The Women of Rockabilly". This gal was a pistol.

You can hear her and some of the other Rockabilly gals of that era here. Man, them broads got some pipes!

Read more about her here.

Left-wing brain, Right-wing...brain?

According to this article in the LATimes, apparently wingnuts do have a large organic mass in their brain housing groups, even if its only function is to hold their ears apart.

In a simple experiment reported todayin the journal Nature Neuroscience, scientists at New York University and UCLA show that political orientation is related to differences in how the brain processes information.

Previous psychological studies have found that conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments whereas liberals are more open to new experiences. The latest study found those traits are not confined to political situations but also influence everyday decisions.

The results show "there are two cognitive styles -- a liberal style and a conservative style," said UCLA neurologist Dr. Marco Iacoboni, who was not connected to the latest research.

Analyzing the data, Sulloway said liberals were 4.9 times as likely as conservatives to show activity in the brain circuits (coulda ended that sentence right there - G) that deal with conflicts, and 2.2 times as likely to score in the top half of the distribution for accuracy.

Based on the results, he said, liberals could be expected to more readily accept new social, scientific or religious ideas.

Harumph. I coulda told 'em that.

Karl Rove Spotted in Paraguay

Evan Essence

After mysteriously disappearing from public sight 2 days ago, Karl Rove has succeeded in eluding angry Democratic Congressional leaders, and flocks of bloggers with cell phone cameras. Now, there have been 3 spottings of Rove in a remote part of Paraguay.

It has been widely reported on the Internet, that George Bush purchased 99,000 acres of land in Paraguay shortly before last Fall's election, which swept away Rove's dream of a permanent Republican majority in Congress. Paraguay is in a region of the World which is traditionally safe for War Criminals.

I just had to post this to show that there's someone else out there as goofy as I am.

"Bring it on" ... revisited

We saw what happened the last time the Chimp decided to wave his weenie around and dare the 'terrists' to "bring it on". Seems it's time for some bravado again though, once again, I doubt we're prepared for the consequences:

...

I assume they thought this was very clever, having a blond American woman [Fran Townsend] insult bin Laden's manhood. (She might as well have held her thumb and forefinger up like she was measuring an inch while she said it.) I'll bet Bush snorted and snickered all afternoon. But sadly, it's probably true that some of bin Laden's followers are just as insecure about their manhood as Townsend's boss is and some poor schmoe in Afghanistan or Iraq or somewhere else willpay the ultimate price for her little taunt.

...

Sunday, September 9, 2007

Culture of Corruption

Bill Clinton, William Jefferson, Bill Clinton, William Jefferson, Bill Cli ...

Froggy links to a list of all the Rethugs in trouble.

... The list is long and very interesting. The list contains about 200 of 'em.

...

The Surge Is working

Click it

As the Iraqis Stand Down, We’ll Stand Up

Daddy Frank nails it. Today's 'must read':

It will be all 9/11 all the time this week, as the White House yet again synchronizes its drumbeating for the Iraq war with the anniversary of an attack that had nothing to do with Iraq. Ignore that fog and focus instead on another date whose anniversary passed yesterday without notice: Sept. 8, 2002. What happened on that Sunday five years ago is the Rosetta Stone for the administration's latest scam.

That was the morning when the Bush White House officially rolled out its fraudulent case for the war. [...]

What followed was an epic propaganda onslaught of distorted intelligence, fake news, credulous and erroneous reporting by bona fide journalists, presidential playacting and Congressional fecklessness. Much of it had been plotted that summer of 2002 by the then-secret White House Iraq Group (WHIG), a small task force of administration brass charged with the Iraq con job.

Today the spirit of WHIG lives. In the stay-the-surge propaganda offensive that crests with this week's Congressional testimony of Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker, history is repeating itself in almost every particular. Even the specter of imminent "nuclear holocaust" has been rebooted in President Bush's arsenal of rhetorical scare tactics.

As always with this White House, telegenic artificial realities are paramount. Exhibit A, of course, was last weekend's precisely timed "surprise" presidential junket: Mr. Bush took the measure of success "on the ground here in Anbar" (as he put it) without ever leaving a heavily fortified American base.

When the line separating spin from reality is so effectively blurred, the White House's propaganda mission has once more been accomplished. No wonder President Bush is cocky again. Stopping in Sydney for the economic summit after last weekend's photo op in Iraq, he reportedly told Australia's deputy prime minister that "we're kicking ass." This war has now gone on so long that perhaps he has forgotten the price our troops paid the last time he taunted our adversaries to bring it on, some four years and 3,500 American military fatalities ago.

Prople will continue to die for lies, spin, and propaganda for another 17 months. It's Bush's way, paying the world back for being such an inadequate, cowardly little man. God damn him.

This year ...

It's even more disgraceful. In addition to playing 9/11 for all it's worth for another year, now the memory of those who died that day will be further defiled by General "Baghdad Bob" Petraeus' "Surge Report", telling Congress how absolutely swimmingly it's going in Iraq.

It's bad enough the cable and broadcast networks will spend another day with nothing but programming from Ground Zero, once more using the corpses of innocents to further their ratings race, to further the agenda of the White House, to get Americans pissed off enough at 'the ragheads', to get Congress distracted enough, so 'business as usual' remains in Iraq.

Most Americans believe nothing will change and anything Petraeus says will be scripted by the White House. It's time to stop looking to the past and look to our future and that, my friends, is very bleak. Things have to be fixed in a big way and repeating "everything changed after 9/11" ain't gonna do it.

The exploitation of 9/11, on every level, is only stagnating this nation. The deaths of 3000 of my friends and neighbors have been exploited for everything from an illegal war in Iraq, to the obfuscation of our civil rights. I'm tired of it. Mark the day, let the dead rest in peace, and stop using it to coerce the American people to do things they know are wrong.

It's time for the Dems in Congress to stand up, call bullshit on Petraeus, and say it's time to change course now, not in a year, not in five, not in ten. September 11th was a black day in our history, let us not allow it to be the milestone historians will point to and say "this was the beginning of the end of the United States of America".

Saturday, September 8, 2007

Quote of the Day

Osama bin Laden via the lovely Avedon:

"Despite America being the greatest economic power and possessing the most powerful and up-to-date military arsenal . . . 19 young men were able, by the grace of Allah, the Most High, to change the direction of its compass."


Osama could have declared "Mission Accomplished" on 12 September 2001.

How could anyone...

Saturday whorage

The next chapter of The Fourth Estate us up at The Practical Press. Render your opinion at my Sort of Contest if you feel like it too.

As always, pimp yourselves in comments.

Friday, September 7, 2007

Is it me?

I'm no forensic engineer, but something strikes me funny about 'then' and 'now'.

The OAPEC Summit

Our Fearless Leader embarrasses us again. The Rude One summarizes:

...

Another meeting with leaders of other countries, another rank humiliation, with Bush oblivious or just apathetic to how much he's walking around with piss stains on his pants, except now others are pointing out the wet marks to him. Bush, though, doesn't give a fuck. Why should he when his own nation doesn't seem to?

Osama's Bitch

Click, if only to embiggen his chachabingoes

Non cogitat, ergo Chimp est

Daily Mail

The US president thanked Australian premier John Howard for visiting 'Austrian troops' in Iraq.

An honest mistake given that Austria is the birthplace of both Bush's and Howard's idol, nicht wahr? (heels click)

Talking at a business forum on the eve of an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Sydney, Mr Bush also told Mr Howard: "Mr Prime Minister, thank you for your introduction. Thank you for being such a fine host for the OPEC summit."

And this was with a script! They never let him speak off the cuff. Surely the neocons could have found a son of a bitch for their puppet mouthpiece that could at least talk. Maybe they could have found one that could read too. Or maybe they couldn't. Perhaps Bush was the only idiot they could find who was dumb enough to go along with their imperialistic warmongering bullshit and a closet fascist to boot. He does OK at that.

I used to feel embarrassed as an American when Bush would commit verbal and social gaffes. Not any more. He doesn't speak for me, let him fuck up however he wants to and show himself for the stupe he is. It's not like we didn't know.

Petraeus will delaeus, betraeus

Paul Krugman nails it again in a 'must read':

Here’s what will definitely happen when Gen. David Petraeus testifies before Congress next week: he’ll assert that the surge has reduced violence in Iraq — as long as you don’t count Sunnis killed by Sunnis, Shiites killed by Shiites, Iraqis killed by car bombs and people shot in the front of the head.

There are five things I hope Democrats in Congress will remember.

First, no independent assessment has concluded that violence in Iraq is down. On the contrary, estimates based on morgue, hospital and police records suggest that the daily number of civilian deaths is almost twice its average pace from last year. And a recent assessment by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found no decline in the average number of daily attacks.

So how can the military be claiming otherwise? Apparently, the Pentagon has a double super secret formula that it uses to distinguish sectarian killings (bad) from other deaths (not important); according to press reports, all deaths from car bombs are excluded, and one intelligence analyst told The Washington Post that “if a bullet went through the back of the head, it’s sectarian. If it went through the front, it’s criminal.” So the number of dead is down, as long as you only count certain kinds of dead people.

Second, Gen. Petraeus has a history of making wildly overoptimistic assessments of progress in Iraq that happen to be convenient for his political masters.

Third, any plan that depends on the White House recognizing reality is an idle fantasy. According to The Sydney Morning Herald, on Tuesday Mr. Bush told Australia’s deputy prime minister that “we’re kicking ass” in Iraq. Enough said.

Fourth, the lesson of the past six years is that Republicans will accuse Democrats of being unpatriotic no matter what the Democrats do. Democrats gave Mr. Bush everything he wanted in 2002; their reward was an ad attacking Max Cleland, who lost both legs and an arm in Vietnam, that featured images of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.

Finally, the public hates this war and wants to see it ended. Voters are exasperated with the Democrats, not because they think Congressional leaders are too liberal, but because they don’t see Congress doing anything to stop the war.

And six or seven months from now it will be the same thing all over again. Mr. Bush will stage another photo op at Camp Cupcake, the Marine nickname for the giant air base he never left on his recent visit to Iraq. The administration will move the goal posts again, and the military will come up with new ways to cook the books and claim success.

Mr. Krugman is a small man with a big sack. He has a way of cuttin' through the shit as well.

FYI - CRS: US SOL

From BuzzFlash:

PDF of Congressional Report Indicating the Case for Iraq is Hopeless

Advance Copy

Following on the heels of Wordsmith's and Fixer's posts just below this one, from Yahoo! News:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government has obtained a copy of a purported new videotape of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and is studying it, U.S. officials said on Friday.

Studying it? Or are they editing it? As a prescient sage commented in Wordsmith's post:

He can release it as soon as the WH approves it.

Ahem...

"Six years after 9/11, the arrests in Germany and Denmark this week, and the battles we fight against al Qaeda in Iraq, Afghanistan ... remind us of the continuing threat we face from extremists and why we must continue to take the fight to them wherever they are."

Unless it's in Western Pakistan. Or anywhere else in the world when the terrorists are friends and bidness partners of the Bushes.

Update:

OBL's video already has a Wikipedia entry. Yeesh.

Exactly!

Blue Girl's quote by way of Brother Lurch:

...

Europe has been dealing with terrorism, and doing so effectively, for many years now, and they have done so with common-sense security measures and with good, old-fashioned police work. Today, they led the way once again, showing us once more that the way to effectively fight terrorism is law enforcement, not blowing shit up, invading countries that didn't attack us, and terrorizing the citizens of said country.

...


Because the "War on Terra" is merely an excuse to steal the resources of a sovereign nation.

Update:

Being I'm really late for work, but I accidentally put my tinfoil hat on, I'll do this quickly. Related to Wordsmith's post below.

Ya think the Chimp and Osama (or Familia bin Laden) conspired to oust a secular dictator and divvy up the loot - oil for Bush/Cheney, more Mujaheddin for Osama?

Off to the shop ...

Contrived or Just Downright Thoughtful

Is it just me or does this seem just a bit, um, contrived? Or - sure, it could be just very thoughtful on his part.

According to al-Qaida's media arm, Bin Laden is planning a video for release on 9/11.

Wonder who could put it in the proper perspective for us? Maybe George 'We're Kicking Ass in Iraq' Bush?

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Tell him what he wants to hear ...

Bill Maher has a good idea:

New Rule: For the next 18 months, let Bush be Reagan. A completely dissociative personality who lets the real work of the nation go on elsewhere, while he sits behind his desk and hums. I don't think the problem is that Bush lives in a bubble. I say make the bubble thicker. Use the armor we can't get to the troops. For example, on this whole "bomb Iran" thing. Let's not, and just tell him we did.

...


Keep him ignant and figure out a way to overload the Dickster's pacemaker and we might make it through until the elections.

Great thanks to litbrit at Shakes' place for the heads up.

Funny, pathetic, ignorant, and all too prevalent

Go have some fun and read Mark Morford's idiotic wingnut hate mail. Here's some bait:

Why are you promoting sex so intensely? Wet, slippery, dirty sex?

As opposed to dry, raspy, God-fearing clean Repuglican sex, followed by beating your wife for being a sinner because she pretended to like it? Yeesh.

Much more. It embarrasses me that these are Americans writing this crap.

Someone is trying to warn us

Larry Johnson

Why the hubbub over a B-52 taking off from a B-52 base in Minot, North Dakota and subsequently landing at a B-52 base in Barksdale, Louisiana? That’s like getting excited if you see a postal worker in uniform walking out of a post office. And how does someone watching a B-52 land identify the cruise missiles as nukes? It just does not make sense.

So I called a old friend and retired B-52 pilot and asked him. What he told me offers one compelling case of circumstantial evidence. My buddy, let’s call him Jack D. Ripper, reminded me that the only times you put weapons on a plane is when they are on alert or if you are tasked to move the weapons to a specific site.

Then he told me something I had not heard before.

Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. Gee, why would we want cruise missile nukes at Barksdale Air Force Base. Can’t imagine we would need to use them in Iraq. Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?

His final point was to observe that someone on the inside obviously leaked the info that the planes were carrying nukes. A B-52 landing at Barksdale is a non-event. A B-52 landing with nukes. That is something else.

Now maybe there is an innocent explanation for this? I can’t think of one. What is certain is that the pilots of this plane did not just make a last minute decision to strap on some nukes and take them for a joy ride. We need some tough questions and clear answers. What the hell is going on? Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran? I don’t know, but it is a question worth asking.

"Ask" shit. Lock Cheney up before he does something we'll all regret for the rest of our lives.

Twenty-Two Things We Now Know Six Years After 9/11

Yep, twenty-two. I counted 'em. From The Crisis Papers:

What we now more fully understand is how the CheneyBush Administration utilized the murderous terrorism of 9/11 as the one-size-fits-all justification for their unfolding domestic and foreign agenda.

By and large, one can sum up that overall agenda as: Amass and control power in the U.S. and much of the world, and, in cahoots with their corporate supporters, loot the treasury. All this was to be carried out secretly, with no accountability.

Here followeth the 22. How he got it down to that few is pretty amazing.

In sum, we know that permanent-war policy abroad and police-state tactics at home are taking us into a kind of American fascism domestically and an imperial foreign policy overseas. All aspects of the American polity are infected with the militarist Know-Nothingism emanating from the top, with governmental and vigilante-type crackdowns on protesters, dissent, free speech, freedom of assembly happening regularly on both the local and federal levels. More and more, America is resembling Germany in the early 1930s, with group pitted against group while the central government amasses more and more power and control of its put-upon citizens, and criticizing The Leader's policies is denounced as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

The good news is that after suffering through six-plus years of the CheneyBush presidency, and despite the Bush-compliant corporate mass-media that often disgraces the journalistic profession, the public's blinders are falling off. The Republicans can count on no more than 30% of the voting population for support. The 2006 defeat of the Republicans in the House and Senate and Tom DeLay's fall from power are good symbols of this, and the true nature of these men and their regime is finally starting to hit home. Cheney is acknowledged as the true power behind the throne, and Bush is seen for what he is: an insecure, uncurious, arrogant, dangerous, dry-drunk bully who is endangering U.S. national interests abroad with his reckless and incompetently-managed wars, his wrecking of the U.S. economy at home, and with his over-reaching in all areas.

If a Democratic president and vice president had behaved similarly to Bush and Cheney, they'd have been in the impeachment dock in a minute.

No shit.

He has a few less than complimentary things to say about the Dems as well. By comparison, however, they are a glowing tribute. Go see.

Baghdad's still Burning

Riverbend posts from Syria:

The Syrian border was almost equally packed, but the environment was more relaxed. People were getting out of their cars and stretching. Some of them recognized each other and waved or shared woeful stories or comments through the windows of the cars. Most importantly, we were all equal. Sunnis and Shia, Arabs and Kurds… we were all equal in front of the Syrian border personnel.

We were all refugees- rich or poor. And refugees all look the same- there’s a unique expression you’ll find on their faces- relief, mixed with sorrow, tinged with apprehension. The faces almost all look the same.

The first minutes after passing the border were overwhelming. Overwhelming relief and overwhelming sadness… How is it that only a stretch of several kilometers and maybe twenty minutes, so firmly segregates life from death?

How is it that a border no one can see or touch stands between car bombs, militias, death squads and… peace, safety? It’s difficult to believe- even now. I sit here and write this and wonder why I can’t hear the explosions.

I wonder at how the windows don’t rattle as the planes pass overhead. I’m trying to rid myself of the expectation that armed people in black will break through the door and into our lives. I’m trying to let my eyes grow accustomed to streets free of road blocks, hummers and pictures of Muqtada and the rest…

I'm glad she made it OK.

Let's go with option #2...

Click to embiggen

Bullshit walks ...

Greenwald looks at Republican Tough-Guy Syndrome. Now, I don't know what a tough guy is. I've been called a tough guy over the years and I've also been called a pussycat. I'm just trying to be the man I aspire to be. It looks to me like the Rethugs put too much stock in the appearance of toughness and not so much emphasis on acts of toughness be they moral, mental, or physical.

...

Virtually the entire top layer of Republican leaders, both political and media figures, are the very opposite of the virtues this movement claims to embody. From Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the rest of the right-wing noise machine, along with our brave neoconservative warmongers -- to say nothing of the likes of George Bush and Dick Cheney -- it is virtually impossible to locate genuine acts of strength, bravery, regular-guy wholesomeness, or any of the warrior attributes and virtues of traditional masculinity they claim to exude.

Indeed, as this Mark Hemingway "sissy mary" outburst illustrates, the opposite is almost always true. The gap between the Mythological Right-Wing Male Leader and the reality of their actual leaders is virtually infinite. Examining that gaping disconnect between what their leaders really are and what they pretend to be -- and highlighting the manipulative cultural themes the right-wing has wielded to win elections -- is the topic of my current book. [my ems]

...


We have a saying where I come from. "Cash talks, bullshit walks."

Perfect Storm

How long have I been saying the economic conditions the Rethugs created could not sustain themselves? Truthfully, I expected a recession a couple years ago (didn't think the housing bubble would stay intact so long), but the chickens are coming home as we speak:

GOP economics are coming together to build the perfect storm. Not so surprisingly the easy credit system that the financial market wanted and the GOP delivered has turned out to be a major problem and is dragging down the economy. Add to that the brilliant GOP plan to cut taxes during a war plus the black hole of spending in Iraq (including heavy payouts to GOP-friendly businesses) and you have just about all you need for a soft economy. While Greenspan never saw this coming, plenty of others did but were swept aside because everyone had houses and money was falling from the sky.

...

Brain Bleach Alert!

Fox 'News' Superheroes. [not work safe]

Hey, if I have to have that picture in my head, so do you.

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

They just seem gay ... revisited

Now, I don't know if I agree with the act of 'outing' closeted gay folks, but not having a frame of reference, I'll leave that argument to the folks who have a dog in the fight. However, I like to see hypocrites suck ass:

In the wake of closeted Sen. Larry Craig’s self-outing in an airport men’s room this summer, Mike Rogers, the Washington-based publisher of blogActive who outed Craig, is threatening to reveal the secret sexual identities of two leading GOP senators, while two allegedly gay Republican congressmen are making headlines and drawing unwelcome attention to themselves, the timing of which could not be worse.

...


Sorry, boys, but you're complicit in too much fucked up shit. Hope ya all crash and burn.

Some things never change...

LATimes story about some ree-croots' first day in the Marine Corps.

(the recruiter) Diazdumeng hugged each one and whispered encouragement. "Hey, you'll do great," he said. As the recruits reached the door, he yelled out: "I love you guys!"

The intake officer, a thin, intense woman carrying a clipboard, sang out in a saccharine tone: "Oh, isn't that sweet! He loves you!"

Well, maybe some things do change a little...

The center's commander, a Marine major, gave a long motivational talk, stressing educational opportunities and pay -- $1,500 a month for most recruits -- that with increases in rank would accumulate to $100,000 over four years in the unlikely event they saved every penny.

I got $73 a month, but I got a big raise after 10 days when they kicked me up to $78. Performance-based, no doubt. Later on, as an E-4 with over 2 years service, I got $212.50. I certainly didn't join to try to make a living, but some guys were after the three hots and a cot. I never saw $100 all at once during my whole enlistment. I take that back - a coupla times we got paid in cash, and there were many thousands of dollars laid out on a table, guarded by several well-armed Gunnies, like someone was gonna scoop it all up and make a break for the front gate three miles away.

The only things the single guys needed money for was laundry, smokes, toiletries, and beer. There weren't many married guys in those days. Today, the recruits have to pay for their uniforms and God knows what else that we got with the deal. The Marine Corps provided the necessities of life instead of Halliburton.

The driver warned the recruits, just before reaching the Marine depot at dusk, that a drill instructor would soon rush aboard and "go crazy."

Me and three other guys got driven in the back of a pickup from the San Diego bus station. The only warning we got was that the gate guard looked at us and shook his head. The first five seconds off the truck, we all thought we had just committed the biggest mistake of our lives.

All night long and well past dawn, they followed orders. Recruits were selected at random and ordered to scream the same instructions at each of the 458 recruits processed that night.

I drew 'firewatch' my first night, which meant I stood outside the NCOIC's office staring at the clock above his desk. Every fifteen minutes I took a walk around the building to make sure it wasn't on fire. I got a small victory in that I snuck a smoke on one of my tours. Scared me to death to do it too, but I felt like I really got over on 'em.

Still, they had no regrets: They yearned for their eagle, globe and anchor -- the Corps symbol pinned to the chest of each newly minted Marine. And as corny as it sounded to some of their friends, they wanted to serve their country.

I just wanted to be a Marine. I don't think I realized I was serving my country until about twenty years later.

Only the details have changed in 44 years. These kids will emerge from the other end of MCRD as Marines just like they always have. Most of the ones who survive will be just as proud of it in later years as I am.

Empire of Stupidity

Tom Engelhardt with a very good read about 'Vietnam sybdrome', the neocon militarists, and how they are causing the United States to do a re-enactment of the Fall of Rome. Take a lunch.

As David Walker, U.S. Comptroller and head of the nonpartisan Government Accounting Office, pointed out recently, the American government has also, in a remarkably short period of time, taken on the look of a faltering imperial Rome with "an over-confident and over-extended military in foreign lands and fiscal irresponsibility by the central government." And imagine - it was only a few years ago that neocon pundits were hailing the U.S. as a power "more dominant than any since Rome." Think instead: The Roman Empire on crack cocaine.

Looking back, it will undoubtedly be clear, if it isn't already, that, with the adherents of the cult of force at the helm of the ship of state, the world of fantasy took over and, even in imperial terms, what resulted was an empire of stupidity, hustling headlong down the slope of decline. That's often the way with blind faith, with anything, in fact, that prevents you from actually taking in the world as it is.

The Bush administration is not alone in being unable to face the idea of defeat. Sometimes even crushed imperial states, blind with defeat, can't admit what's happening to them. Think of Japan in August 1945, facing a defeat so total that just about every one of its cities had been burnt to a cinder. Japan's leaders still couldn't say the word. When the emperor gave his surrender speech (and his previously god-like voice was heard for the first time by ordinary Japanese), he claimed that, well, things hadn't turned out quite as expected. You can search that speech in vain for an actual acknowledgement of defeat.

So imagine a country whose fundamentalist leader sits in an untouched office, where the crisis of the day seems to be a faltering of the home sales market or a foot under a stall in a public bathroom, where the young he's sent to their deaths have largely come from out of the way places, where the stock market remains reasonably buoyant, and the worst casualties are taken on holiday highways.

It's important to remember, however, that there was once quite another tradition in America. Whatever our country was in my 1950s childhood, Americans were still generally raised to believe that empire was a dreadful, un-American thing. We were, of course, already garrisoning the globe, but there was that other hideous empire, the Soviet one, to point to. Perhaps the urge for a republic, not an empire still lies hidden somewhere in the American psyche.

Please read the rest.

The internets are truly the wonder of the age, making stuff like that available to read 24/7. It never ceases to amaze me.

Walk Score

Go check out Walk Score just for fun:

We help homebuyers, renters, and real estate agents find houses and apartments in great neighborhoods. Walk Score shows you a map of what's nearby and calculates a Walk Score for any property. Buying a house in a walkable neighborhood is good for your health and good for the environment.

I checked out my own address of course. Even though we have no sidewalks or street lights, my location got 46 out of 100 for having some businesses not too far away. They list some that aren't there any more, and left out some new ones, so they're slightly out of date. Also, they don't point out that it's all downhill going, and all uphill coming back.

The only other address I tried belongs to a guy I know in beautiful downtown Lawn Guyland whose 'hood got 25, although he has a deli/grocery (if it's really there) a block away and many more businesses a little farther away.

New mechanical procedure in Nepal

KATHMANDU (Reuters) - Officials at Nepal's state-run airline have sacrificed two goats to appease Akash Bhairab, the Hindu sky god, following technical problems with one of its Boeing 757 aircraft, the carrier said Tuesday.

I wonder if that would work with motorcycles? After I fix the bike, I could have lunch.

"Yet you are lying, Mr. Bush."

[Transcript of Olbermann's Special Comment last night. Video here.]

Finally tonight, a Special Comment about Mr. Bush’s trip, and his startling admission of the true motive for this war, which was revealed in his absence.

And so he is back from his annual surprise gratuitous photo-op in Iraq, and what a sorry spectacle it was.

But it was nothing compared to the spectacle of one unfiltered, unguarded, horrifying quotation in the new biography to which Mr. Bush has consented.

As he deceived the troops at Al-Asad Air Base yesterday with the tantalizing prospect that some of them might not have to risk being killed and might get to go home, Mr. Bush probably did not know that, with his own words, he had already proved that he had been lying — is lying… will be lying — about Iraq.

He presumably did not know, that there had already appeared those damning excerpts from Robert Draper’s book “Dead Certain.”

“I’m playing for October-November,” Mr. Bush said to Draper.

That, evidently, is the time during which, he thinks he can sell us the real plan.

Which is, to quote him: “To get us in a position where the presidential candidates, will be comfortable about sustaining a presence.”

Comfortable, that is, with saying about Iraq, again quoting the President, “stay longer.”

And there it is, sir. We’ve caught you.

Your goal is not to bring some troops home — maybe — if we let you have your way now;

Your goal is not to set the stage for eventual withdrawal;

You are, to use your own disrespectful, tone-deaf word, playing at getting the next Republican nominee to agree to jump into this bottomless pit with you, and take us with him, as we stay in Iraq for another year, and another, and another, and anon.

Everything you said about Iraq yesterday, and everything you will say, is a deception, for the purpose of this one cynical, unacceptable, brutal goal — perpetuating this war indefinitely.

War today, war tomorrow, war forever!

And you are playing at it!

Playing!

A man with any self-respect, having inadvertently revealed such an evil secret, would have already resigned and fled the country!

You have no remaining credibility about Iraq, sir.

And yet, yesterday at Al-Asad, Mr. Bush kept playing — and this time, using the second of his two faces.
The President told reporters, “They, (General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker) “tell me if the kind of success we are now seeing continues, it will be possible to maintain the same level of security with fewer American forces.”

And so, Mr. Bush got his fraudulent headlines today: “Bush May Bring Some Troops Home.”

While the reality is, we know from what he told Draper, that the President’s true hope is that they will not come home; but that they will stay there, because he is keeping them there now, in hope that those from his political party fighting to succeed him, will prolong this unendurable disaster into the next decade.

But, to a country dying of thirst, the President seemed to vaguely promise a drink from a full canteen — a promise predicated on the assumption that he is not lying.

Yet you are lying, Mr. Bush. Again. But now, we know why.

You gave away more of yourself than you knew in the Draper book

And you gave away more still, on the arduous trip back out of Iraq — hours in the air, without so much as a single vacation.

“If you look at my comments over the past eight months,” you told reporters, “it’s gone from a security situation — in the sense that we’re either going to get out and there will be chaos, or, more troops. Now, the situation has changed, where I’m able to speculate on the hypothetical.”

Mr. Bush, the only “hypothetical” here is that you are not now holding our troops hostage.

You have no intention of withdrawing them.

But that doesn’t mean you can’t pretend you’re thinking about it, does it?

That is your genius, sir — as you see it, anyway.

You can deduce what we want — we, the people, remember us? — and then use it against us.

You can hold that canteen up and promise it to the parched nation.

And the untold number of Americans whose lives have not been directly blighted by Iraq — or who do not realize that their safety has been reduced and not increased by Iraq — they will get the bullet points: ‘Bush is thinking about bringing some troops home. Bush even went to Iraq.’

You can fool some of the people all of the time, can’t you, Mr. Bush?

You are playing us!

And as for the most immediate victims of the President’s perfidy and shameless manipulation — those troops, yesterday sweating literally as he spoke at Al-Asad Air Base…

Tonight, again sweating figuratively in The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death…

The President saved, for them, the most egregious “playing” in the entire trip.

“I want to tell you this about the decision, about my decision about troop levels. Those decisions will be based on a calm assessment by our military commanders on the conditions on the ground — not a nervous reaction by Washington politicians to poll results in the media.”

One must compliment Mr. Bush’s writer.

That, perhaps, was the mostly perfectly crafted phrase of his Presidency.

For depraved indifference to Democracy, for the craven projection of political motives onto those trying to save lives and save a nation, for a dismissal of the value of the polls and the importance of the media… for a summary of all he does not hold dear about this nation or its people — nothing… could top that.

As if, sir, you listened to all the “calm assessments” of our military commanders –rather than firing the ones who dared say The Emperor Has No Clothes, and The President, No Judgment;

As if, sir, your entire presidency was not a “nervous reaction”, and you yourself, nothing but a Washington politician;

As if, sir, “the media” does not largely divide into those parts your minions are playing, and those others who unthinkingly and uncritically serve as your echo chamber, at a time when the nation’s future may depend on the airing of dissent.

And as if, sir, those polls were not so overwhelming, and not so clearly reflective of the nation’s agony and the nation’s insistence.

But this President has ceased to listen.

This President has decided that night is day, and death is life, and enraging the world against us, is safety.

And this laziest of Presidents, actually interrupted his precious time off to fly to Iraq to play at a photo opportunity with soldiers, some of whom will — on his orders — be killed before the year, maybe the month, is out.

Just over 500 days remain in this Presidency.

Consider the dead who have piled up on the battlefield in these last 500 days.

Consider the singular fraudulence of this President’s trip to Iraq yesterday, and the singular fraudulence of the selling of the Petraeus Report in these last 500 days.

Consider how this President has torn away at the fabric of this nation in a manner of which terrorists can only dream in these last 500 days.

And consider again how this President has spoken to that biographer: that he is “playing for October-November.” The goal in Iraq is “To get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence” and consider how this revelation contradicts every other rationale he has offered in these last 500 days.

In the context of all that… now, consider… these next 500 days.

Mr. Bush, our presence in Iraq must end.

Even if it means your resignation.

Even if it means your impeachment.

Even if it means a different Republican to serve out your term.

Even if it means a Democratic Congress — and those true Patriots among the Republicans — standing up and denying you another penny for Iraq, other than for the safety and the safe conduct home of our troops.

This country cannot run the risk of what you can still do to this country in the next 500 days…

Not while you, sir… are playing.

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Quote of the Day

That guy from Philadelphia:

So, US deaths are still high. Civilian attacks are still high. Civilian deaths still high. There's been no political reconciliation.

It's been an awesome surge, with hundreds more dead US troops because of the vanities of old men. [my em]

...

Pandemic

Click to Enrage

Ultracapacitors May Have Batteries Beat

AP

Millions of inventions pass quietly through the U.S. patent office each year. Patent No. 7,033,406 did, too, until energy insiders spotted six words in the filing that sounded like a death knell for the internal combustion engine.

An Austin-based startup called EEStor promised "technologies for replacement of electrochemical batteries," meaning a motorist could plug in a car for five minutes and drive 500 miles roundtrip between Dallas and Houston without gasoline.

The technology also could help invigorate the renewable-energy sector by providing efficient, lightning-fast storage for solar power, or, on a small scale, a flash-charge for cell phones and laptops.

Skeptics, though, fear the claims stretch the bounds of existing technology to the point of alchemy.

So? I took alchemy in school. Blacksmithing too. They both still come in handy.

The result is an ultracapacitor, a battery-like device that stores and releases energy quickly.

Batteries rely on chemical reactions to store energy but can take hours to charge and release energy. The simplest capacitors found in computers and radios hold less energy but can charge or discharge instantly. Ultracapacitors take the best of both, stacking capacitors to increase capacity while maintaining the speed of simple capacitors.

Until EEStor produces a final product, Perry said he joins energy professionals and enthusiasts alike in waiting to see if the company can own up to its six-word promise and banish the battery to recycling bins around the world.

"I am skeptical but I'd be very happy to be proved wrong," Perry said.

The problem with capacitors is size. Capacitors are rated in terms of capacitance in units of farads. Most capacitors are very small and measured in microfarads. When I was learning how to fix radios for Uncle Sam's Misguided Children, my instructors told me that a one-farad capacitor would be about the size of a football field. That's maybe a little dated, along with the vacuum tubes they taught me about, although those are still being used for design and prototype work because they are highly adjustable. But I digress...

There are capacitors in every piece of electronic gear. Period. I think their earliest use in automotive technology was as the condenser in contact-breaker-point ignition systems, where they were used to prevent counterflow voltage from causing arcing at the points and subsequent rapid point wear. CB ignition has gone the way of the buggy whip.

In motorcycles, electrolytic capacitors are sometimes used as battery eliminators, providing a load for the charging system, in effect fooling the charging system into thinking the system has a battery. I explained this to my buddy Sluggo one time in his garage, and his reply was, "Damn, how ya gonna fool it now? You said it right in front of it!", pointing at his motorcycle.

There's no reason you couldn't do this on cars as well, if your car has a kickstarter.

In this age of electronic miracle progress, nothing seems impossible. I hope they can do it.

Crossposted at the world's other Best Blog.

National Service



From time to time, Fixer and myself have espoused a belief that national service is called for to make actual citizens out of the apathetic populace. Time magazine, obviously regular readers of the Brain, finally picked up on it.

But at this moment in our history, 220 years after the Constitutional Convention, the way to get citizens involved in civic life, the way to create a common culture that will make a virtue of our diversity, the way to give us that more capacious sense of "we" — finally, the way to keep the Republic — is universal national service. No, not mandatory or compulsory service but service that is in our enlightened self-interest as a nation. We are at a historic junction; with the first open presidential election in more than a half-century, it is time for the next President to mine the desire that is out there for serving and create a program for universal national service that will be his — or her — legacy for decades to come. It is the simple but compelling idea that devoting a year or more to national service, whether military or civilian, should become a countrywide rite of passage, the common expectation and widespread experience of virtually every young American.

The basic plan as outlined in the article uses a "carrots instead of sticks" approach. Hey, whatever works - at least somebody's thinking of ways to make it workable. Go read and tell us what you think.

They call for us Olde Fartes (lctp) to do what we can in our Golden Years to act as mentors to the youngsters. I volunteer to help the babe on the cover learn whatever she wants to know and then some...

They just seem gay ...

The great Jon Swift:

...

Of course, seeming to be gay is not the same as actually being gay, despite what the Minneapolis police department believes. In fact, the more one looks at the evidence that Craig seems to be gay, the more one can see that it is really just evidence of being conservative. There are many attributes of conservatism that seem really gay and unfortunately the more we deny that we are gay, the gayer we seem. This incident should put a chill in every conservative who has a "wide stance" or belongs to a barbershop quartet.

...

Unfortunately, many conservatives are awkward and shy around women, which just fuels rumors that they are gay. That is why, for example, blogger Ace of Spades often seems so gay even though he is one of the most heterosexual unmarried bloggers on the Internet. Like many conservatives, Ace of Spades tries to overcompensate for these unfair perceptions by making a lot of anti-gay jokes. But sometimes his efforts to use light-hearted anti-gay humor to deflect these false impressions make him seem obsessed with homosexuality. And no matter how many times Dan Riehl tells us that he turned his back on his gay brother who died of AIDS or that he can't stop thinking about how homosexual acts disgust him whenever he sees Barney Frank on television, there are still people who will say that maybe he protests too much. It is a Catch-22 situation that many conservatives sadly get caught in.

...


See, it's all a big misunderstanding. Only the liberals are gay ... well ... aside from the 'Log Cabins'. Heh ... he said 'log'.

Monday, September 3, 2007

The Golden Voice of the Great Southwest.

So there I was - oops, sounds like a war story, sorry 'bout that - cruisin' around the internets lookin' fer somethin' apropos for Labor Day. Oh, I found some stuff all right, but I decided on this as more entertaining.

This is U. Utah Phillips, the Golden Voice of the Great Southwest, at the Strawberry Music Festival earlier this year at Camp Mather, Yosemite. We've posted about him before. Go see. Many links. If you go to his search at YouTube, there's much more.

Mr. Phillips is possibly the most distinguished resident of my county. Please enjoy.

Things are looking up ...

Oh ... wait ... Logan:

...

The White House says the decision to have the president fly into Anbar was to show the successes of the surge in that region and touting this as “a symbolic expression of impatience with political paralysis in the nation’s capital.” The truth of the matter is that the president is nowhere near an Iraqi city, he’s tucked away in a remote area and safe — surrounded by soldiers. I guess this is the best spin they could put on this seeing as how after four years of U.S. occupation, it still isn’t safe enough for him to fly into Baghdad.


As usual, the Chimp is supportin' the troops using our soldiers as props for a photo op.

Labor Day 2007 - Which Side Are You On?


Come all of you good workers
Good news to you I’ll tell
Of how that good old union
Has come in here to dwell


My daddy was a miner
And I’m a miner’s son
And I’ll stick with the union
Till every battle’s won


They say in Harlan County
There are no neutrals there
You’ll either be a union man
Or a thug for J.H. Blair


Oh, workers can you stand it?
Oh, tell me how you can
Will you be a lousy scab
Or will you be a man?


Don’t scab for the bosses
Don’t listen to their lies
Us poor folks haven’t got a chance
Unless we organize


Florence Reece*

“In 1931, coal miners in Harlan County were on strike. Armed company deputies roamed the countryside, terrorizing the mining communities, looking for union leaders to beat, jail, or kill. But coal miners, brought up lean and hard in the Kentucky mountain country, knew how to fight back, and heads were bashed and bullets fired on both sides in Bloody Harlan. It was this kind of class war -- the mine owners and their hired deputies on one side, and the independent, free-wheeling Kentucky coal-miners on the other -- that provided the climate for Florence Reece's "Which Side Are You On?" In it she captured the spirit of her times with blunt eloquence.”

*(Hat tip to Celeste Monforton, The Pump Handle, who turned me onto this incredible song!)

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Contest ... sort of

Since The Fourth Estate is winding down (2 chapters left), I was rooting around in the files, looking for something to follow. Since there was a favorable response to the sci-fi epic The Captains, my first thought was Thirty Days at Zeta and then I reread Birthright and I thought you folks might like that too.

So, I figured I'd leave it up to y'all (did a New Yorker just say 'y'all'?). I put the prologue of both up at one of my blogs and I'd like you folks to decide which one you'd like me to start posting*. Links below:

Thirty Days at Zeta

Birthright

Thanks for your time. The Sort of Contest ends when September does.

Have a happy and safe Labor Day.

Cross-posted at The Practical Press.

*If you're voting, leave it in comments here.

"And the company takes ...

What the company wants."

Midnight Oil - Blue Sky Mine



Happy Labor Day ...

Thanks to PSoTD for the impetus.

Neverending War

Not satisfied with fucking up one sovereign nation (not counting the United States), destroying their society and infratructure, and making us less safe than before September 11, the Chimp wants to go 2 for 2.

THE Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert.

Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.

...


Does anybody besides the "kill the ragheads" crowd think this is a good idea? An attack on Iran will do nothing but bankrupt this nation and destroy what little credibility we have left in the world.

If the Dems let him get away with it, we might as well give it up.