Monday, November 8, 2004

Bush - Choice Of The Ignorant

Calling the people who voted for Bush the "Retarded Right" may not be very nice but it may be a lot closer to the truth than just sour grapes. Bob Herbert in today's NYTimes:
I think a case could be made that ignorance played at least as big a role in the election's outcome as values. A recent survey by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland found that nearly 70 percent of President Bush's supporters believe the U.S. has come up with "clear evidence" that Saddam Hussein was working closely with Al Qaeda. A third of the president's supporters believe weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. And more than a third believe that a substantial majority of world opinion supported the U.S.-led invasion.

This is scary. How do you make a rational political pitch to people who have put that part of their brain on hold? No wonder Bush won.

The survey, and an accompanying report, showed that there's a fair amount of cluelessness in the ranks of the values crowd. The report said, "It is clear that supporters of the president are more likely to have misperceptions than those who oppose him."

Very cleverly planted and nurtured "misperceptions", I might add. They were led down the Rose Garden path and bought it hook, line and sinker, because they wanted to and Rove well knew it.
I haven't heard any of the postelection commentators talk about ignorance and its effect on the outcome. It's all values, all the time. Traumatized Democrats are wringing their hands and trying to figure out how to appeal to voters who have arrogantly claimed the moral high ground and can't stop babbling about their self-proclaimed superiority. Potential candidates are boning up on new prayers and purchasing time-shares in front-row-center pews.

A more practical approach might be for Democrats to add teach-ins to their outreach efforts. Anything that shrinks the ranks of the clueless would be helpful.

While I agree with the last line, it could get me in trouble. I will say no more on that subject. For now.
What the Democrats don't need is a candidate who is willing to shape his or her values to fit the pundits' probably incorrect analysis of the last election. Values that pivot on a dime were not really values to begin with.

Which is exactly why I refuse to participate in so-called "healing" which is just another word for "capitulation", the way it's being used. The ignoramuses need to have their collective ass kicked, or one ass at a time if need be.

It is also the best reason to not try and appeal to these voters by shifting our attitude toward pandering to the "dark side". If we become as phony as the Right just to win, we have lost.

No comments: