Friday, October 12, 2007

When is a twelve-year-old boy with brain damage a threat? When you're a Repuglicant and losing.

Joe Brewer weighs in on the RS3M* campaign against Graeme Frost.

When is a twelve-year-old boy with brain damage a threat? When he exemplifies the good a government program can do when it provides health security to middle-class Americans.

Conservatives want the popular and successful State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to fail. They fear that if the government helps sick children, more people will start to believe it can ensure health security for everyone. Here's a newsflash: Government can ensure health security for everyone. Governments do exactly that in every other wealthy nation in the world. We just have the bizarre misfortune of living in a country where profit motives stand in the way of adequate care. (The Rockridge Institute will soon launch its Health Care Security Campaign to thoroughly explore these issues, and you can sign up to be notified when it begins.)

You can see the conservative argument clearly in the way they attack young Graeme Frost. In its essence, it is this:

Health care is a privilege that must be earned. If you earn enough to provide for your family but are denied insurance, you must give up all comfort and security to pay for medical treatment. Sell your house. Let insurance companies snatch your savings. Only when you are destitute will it be appropriate for our government to help.

This is how it is presented on the web site of conservative blogger Michelle Malkin, the most prominent flame thrower on this issue:

"But Mark Tapscott's point remains: [P]eople make choices and it's clear the Frosts have made the choice to invest in property and a business, but not in private health insurance. The Maryland-administered version of the federal SCHIP program, by the way, does not impose an asset test on applicants."

There is great practical irony in the conservative position. People of modest means must choose between "investing" in either health care or a home and business. In their world, the parent who goes for a home and business (which provide the child with those other things you need to live like food and shelter) over health care and then goes bankrupt when their child gets sick deserves it because they are bad parents for not providing the health care. The idea that a family should be shackled to an insurance premium instead of being able to better their lives by buying their own home and starting a business is perfectly OK to them.

Apparently, Michelle Ramalamadingdong feels you should pay rent to a landlord, work as a wage slave, spend all your money on health insurance to the enrichment of Big Med, and thus live small and be in thrall to the Ruling Overlord Class all your life if you wish your children to get medical help when they need it if you're not rich. Or poor. That's not exactly the American Dream. What would Malkin know about that? She got hers by conning tiny-brained people. That's her and the Repugs' version of the American Way.

They can kiss my ass. Pardon me, young Graeme, but this shit 'Frosts' my balls.

E.J. Dionne and Paul Krugman also comment on this despicable Repug bullshit. They're smart and speak truth, but they're way too nice about it. Worth a read.

*Repuglicant Spin, Slime, and Smear Machine

No comments: