Thursday, May 3, 2007

Just a simple question . . .

From President Haven't-Got-A-Clue:

"Without a war funding bill, the military has to take money from some other account or training program so the troops in combat have what they need. Without a war funding bill, the Armed Forces will have to consider cutting back on buying new equipment or repairing existing equipment. Without a war funding bill, we add to the uncertainty felt by our military families. Our troops and their families deserve better -- and their elected leaders can do better."


Why, then, did you, in a fit of pique, veto it and delay things?

R.

No comments: