Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Mandatory Christianity

Truthout

A military watchdog organization filed a lawsuit in federal court Tuesday against the Pentagon, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and a US Army major, on behalf of an Army soldier stationed in Iraq. The suit charges the Pentagon with widespread constitutional violations by allegedly trying to force the soldier to embrace evangelical Christianity and then retaliating against him when he refused.

The complaint, filed in US District Court in Kansas City, by the nonprofit Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), on behalf of Jeremy Hall, an Army specialist currently on active duty in Speicher, Iraq, alleges that Hall's First Amendment rights were violated beginning last Thanksgiving when, because of his atheist beliefs, he declined to participate in a Christian prayer ceremony commemorating the holiday.

I think I need not point out but will anyway that Thanksgiving is not a religious holiday. It matters not. The 1st Amendment guarantee of 'freedom of religion' also guarantees 'freedom from religion'.

The complaint charges that Hall, who is based at Fort Riley, Kansas (Figures - G), has been forced to "submit to a religious test as a qualification to his post as a soldier in the United States Army," a violation of Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation said Defense Secretary Robert Gates is named as a defendant in the lawsuit because he has allowed the military to engage in "a pattern and practice of constitutionally impermissible promotions of religious beliefs within the Department of Defense and the United States military."


The higher-highers who pulled this shit are hardly living up to their oath to defend the Constitution, and breaking the law as well. So what's new?

I hope this trooper takes 'em for their shorts, and makes 'em knock off this cheap shit.

Blogrollin'

I just discovered Iraq Oil Report. Good stuff. Example:

Bush/Patraeus/Crocker kept repeating last week the fact that the oil pipeline from Kirkuk to Turkey was reopened after spending most of the war years under attack and out of commission, a small sign of progress. A bomb blast Tuesday morning corrected that.

Check it out.

Sorry to break into your post, pardner, but I didn't want to do another post. Guess who also has a blog now? Krugman! I'll update the blogrolls after dinner. - F.

Bush stands between Cheney and 'first strike' on Iran

Click it. Maybe he'll explode.


Raw Story

Foreign policy expert says Bush has ruled out first-strike on Iran; Worries about 'accidental' conflict
...

Tells RAW he doesn't believe Bush is in the 'Cheney gang' yet

Clemons, director of the American Strategy Program at New America Foundation and publisher of The Washington Note, says Bush has deviated from a Cheney-laid track to launch a first-strike on Iran, citing, as examples, frustrations that the vice president's aides are airing, a conversation with a journalist who sat in on a December 2006 strategy meeting, and private conversations with high-level foreign policy players.

Of the indications that Bush has thus far tabled a preemptive strike, Clemons believes "the most significant is that the Cheney wing feels that Bush is not on their side and they're frustrated with that. The fact that the Cheney wing feels they need to tie Bush's hands, 'end run' the president and remove the 'diplomatic course' from the field of options in front of the President is an indication that Bush hasn’t decided to bomb."

In a truly painful twist of irony, it appears that the Chimp is the only thing standing between us and another criminal war. Oh fucking swell.

This does not exactly fill me with confidence, but it'll have to do. We'll see if, and for how long, Bush can stand up to Satan's Dick.

WWII as unintended metaphor

I'm anxiously awaiting Ken Burns' new documentary miniseries, "The War", on PBS in a few days. Good article in Newsweek about it, and an unintended side effect. Mr. Burns started this project in 2001, so who knew?

Inevitably, though, this documentary also puts you in a moment Burns never foresaw: today, in Iraq, and on a far different home front. No scrap drives, Victory Bonds, rationing or air-raid wardens yelling at you to pull down your shades. Where "home front," in fact, is a quaint expression—except to the families, far fewer than in World War II, with a reason to take it personally. And "war effort" means yellow-ribbon decals in the mall parking lot. In the current war, Burns says, "we're not permitted to shoot the caskets coming back. In this film, we show huge nets from a trawler, each one filled with 15 or 20 flag-draped coffins. Today you can't show the bad stuff. You can't even find the bad stuff, without behaving like a pornographer on the Internet. We don't even know the cost anymore." When Burns began work on "The War" in 2001, he couldn't have known Iraq would become the film's secret subject, even though the place is never mentioned.

Everything these days is about Iraq, from children's health care to New Orleans.

Let's be clear ...

When I posted a link to Atrios' post about Harry Reid finally laying down the law, it was met with understandable cynicism. Personally, I agree with the cynics but it would be a refreshing change if we actually managed to end this mess before the elections next year.

I quoted Kevin Drum the other day, naming the real reason we won't see a conclusion to Bush's Folly.

... And finally, Democrats would no longer have the war as an issue to run on in 2008.


I think we should resign ourselves to the fact that even if it's within the Dems' power to force the Chimp to pull back, it won't happen.

Unfortunately, the Iraq Occupation has been the easiest thing for the Dems to flog to illustrate the Chimp's incompetence. It is simple. All they have to do is point and say "look how bad it is over there". There's no need for 'nuance', no need to explain policy or legal issues to the populace so they understand the issues (sometimes we as bloggers tend to overestimate the general public's ... attention to the issues). Iraq is an easy soundbyte.

"Look, dead soldiers."

"Look, dead Iraqis."

"Look, the wasted money."

"Look, the ineptitude."

"Look, Candidate A, B, C, and D supported the President in this fiasco."

They don't have to do 'nuance' (remember Kerry '04). They don't have to explain policy and procedure and they don't have to explain legal precedent. They just have to point, the horrific failure obvious to all except the Chimp's 'true believers'. The Dems are going to use it all the way to next November and they will not end the horror until they are assured of victory.

Politically expedient but disgusting never the less. The Dems will use Iraq for their purposes just as the Chimp used it for his. Unfortunately, the only ones who are paying are the troops and the Iraqis.

Update:

That is why, though Kleiman's treatise sounds great, it will never be implemented. The ongoing Iraq War is a known quantity, a massive cudgel with which to beat the Republicans. What becomes of Iraq after U.S. troops leave is a political uncertainty. The Dems will never leave themselves so exposed if it all goes to shit over there when we leave (you know the Rethugs will say "look, we pulled out and now the whole region is in chaos"). Not until President Clinton (most likely) sits in the Oval Office. They're not going to jeopardize their advantage.

Off to the shop ...

Baffling the NYPD ...

Now, the New York City Police Department is a professional organization. Regardless of their faults, they do keep a lid on a city of 8 million, no small task. Most cops in this area have seen everything (try to give one of 'em a line of bullshit and see what happens), but there's some shit they're just not prepared for. To wit:

(Queens - WABC, September 18, 2007) - New York Police cornered a cow loose on the streets in Queens Tuesday night.

It happened on 144th Street and 85th Avenue in the Jamaica section.

A mounted trailer has been dispatched to transport the cow, though the animal is not in custody yet.

Police say the animal was spotted at approximately 9:43 p.m. Tuesday.

They say they don't know where the cow came from. An investigation is still ongoing.




Heh ... I love NY.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Are they listening ... finally?

Looks like Harry's growing a sack.

God sued, skips...

Raw Story

A Nebraska lawmaker is taking his complaints about frivolous lawsuits limits all the way to the top.

State Sen. Ernie Chambers is suing God.

"It's a lawsuit against a defendant who has perpetrated much harm and damage on the human race," Chambers said on CNN.

Good on yer, Mr. Chambers, but lemme tell ya how this is gonna go - on your court date, God will Fail To Appear. The judge will issue a bench warrant for His arrest. He'll grant you a judgment in the absence of the Defendant. Good luck trying to collect from that Stiff.

The lawsuit notes that Chambers tried several times to contact the defendant, KETV reported.

“Plaintiff, despite reasonable efforts to effectuate personal service upon Defendant ('Come out, come out, wherever you are') has been unable to do so,” the suit says.

There's more to this than that, but that's the funny part.

I'd like to (censored) her too...

Click to engorge


Reuters

Comic Kathy Griffin's "offensive" remarks about Jesus at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards will be cut from a pre-taped telecast of the show, the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences said on Tuesday.

"A lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award. I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus," an exultant Griffin said, holding up her statuette. "Suck it, Jesus. This award is my god now."

God, I love that gal!

The speech drew fire from a leading Roman Catholic group, the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, which condemned Griffin's remarks as "obscene and blasphemous."

I'd like nothing better than to take a leak in the holy water font just before Donohue gets there and takes a finger dip. And then tell him that he just crossed himself with my piss.

And by the way, Kathy's not the only one with pants around the ankles right now...

Bush's Fake Sheikh

Greg Palast with today's 'must read':

Did you see George all choked up? In his surreal TV talk on Thursday, he got all emotional over the killing by Al Qaeda of Sheik Abu Risha, the leader of the new Sunni alliance with the U.S. against the insurgents in Anbar Province, Iraq.

Here's what you need to know that NPR won't tell you.

1. Sheik Abu Risha wasn't a sheik.
2. He wasn't killed by Al Qaeda.
3. The new alliance with former insurgents in Anbar is as fake as the sheik -- and a murderous deceit.

In other words, Abu Risha was the PR hook used to sell the "success" of the surge.

The sheik wasn't a sheik. He was a fake. While proclaiming to Rick that he was "the leader of all the Iraqi tribes," Abu lead no one. But for a reported sum in the millions in cash for so-called "reconstruction contracts," Abu Risha was willing to say he was Napoleon and Julius Caesar and do the hand-shakie thing with Bush on camera.

There are some real sheiks in Anbar, such as Ali Hathem of the dominant Dulaimi tribe, who told Rick that Abu Risha was a con man. Where was his tribe, this tribal leader? "The Americans like to create characters like Disney cartoon heroes." Then Ali Hathem added, "Abu Risha is no longer welcome" in Anbar.

"Not welcome" from a sheik in Anbar is roughly the same as a kiss on both cheeks from the capo di capi. Within days, when Abu Risha returned from Dubai to Dulaimi turf in Ramadi, Bush's hand-sheik was whacked.

On Thursday, Bush said Abu Risha was killed, "fighting Al Qaeda" -- and the White House issued a statement that the sheik was "killed by al Qaeda."

Bullshit.

Who got Abu Risha? Nothing -- NOTHING -- moves in Ramadi without the approval of the REAL tribal sheiks. They were none-too-happy, as Hathem noted, about the millions the U.S. handed to Risha. The sheiks either ordered the hit -- or simply gave the bomber free passage to do the deed.

But creepy and deadly or not, these capi of the desert were effective in eliminating "Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia." Indeed, as U.S. military so proudly pointed out to Rick, the moment the sheiks declared their opposition to Al Qaeda -- i.e., got the payments from the U.S. taxpayers -- Al Qaeda instantly diappeared (my em).

This miraculous military change, where the enemy just evaporates, has one explanation: the sheiks ARE al Qaeda in Mesopotamia. Just like the Sopranos extract "protection" payments from New Jersey businesses, the mobsters of Anbar joined our side when we laid down the loot.

Here's the money line:

So the great "success" of the surge is our arming and providing cover for ethnic cleansing in Anbar. Nice, Mr. Bush. And with the U.S. press "embedded," we won't get the real story. Even Democrats are buying into the Anbar "awakening" fairy tale.

This Iraqi got it right: the surge is a crock.

We knew that. Funny how as soon as we started coughin' up the loot, the windows quit gettin' broken. A "return on success" is how it's described by our little punk chimp.

I'm glad things are better in Anbar. It's good for the Marines to take fewer casualties, but I'm not exactly thrilled about getting to pay for 'ethnosectarian' genocide. 'Ethnic cleansing' sounds almost nice, like sweeping and swabbing to make the joint look better. It's MURDER.

The sheikhs punk'd Bush bad, but that's not hard to do, and he gets the talking points he wants even if they're complete bullshit.

Update:

More on this at AlterNet. 'Must read' #2, with video:

RR: There have been a lot of reports about the fact that the people who the U.S. is working with, the supposed "freedom fighters," the "counter-insurgents" are former insurgents. They were Iraqi al Qaeda before they started working with the Americans. That is troubling because if they were fighting the Americans once, they'll fight Americans again. And more troubling for the future of Iraq is the fact that many of the tribes that the U.S. is working with are war criminals who are directly responsible for ethnic cleansing and who are using American support to prepare for sectarian civil war. The U.S. is funding Sunni militias. They already funded the Shia militias. They're now funding all sides of this sectarian war.

Please read. It behooves us to know more than we are allowed to get from the MSM.

Wish I was there ...

Yeah, right. The Chimp waving his prick (or flinging shit) to impress the righty bloggers:

...

" N.Z. Bear," one of the eight guests sitting around a table with Bush at the White House, reported: "Responding to one of the bloggers in Iraq he expressed envy that they could be there, and said he'd like to be there but 'One, I'm too old to be out there, and two, they would notice me.'"

...


At which point all the assembled bloggers pulled their pants to their ankles and began flogging furiously.

Froomkin points out the irony:

...

He certainly hasn't ever put himself in harm's way. The president who avoided serving in Vietnam as a young man has made only three visits to Iraq since declaring that major combat operations were over more than four years ago. All three of the visits were unannounced and featured extensive security.

...


I'd wager none of the bloggers have served either but all of 'em can talk a good line. I wonder if they all had to take turns fellating the Royal Prick for the opportunity.

Suck a cock ...

And you're under the bus. Break the law ... not so much:

Today, Melanie Sloan, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), sent a letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) asking that he remove Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) from his committee assignments and refer the criminal matters surrounding the FBI investigation into Sen. Stevens' activities to the Senate Ethics Committee.

...


Selling your power and influence is quite all right. Soliciting gay sex in an airport restroom is a mortal sin. Don't get it, but I've given up trying to understand Washington in general, the Republicans in particular.

It's getting so even the most clueless of us can see the blatant hypocrisy.

Thanks to Steve Benen for the link.

Monday, September 17, 2007

"...a man whose history makes Bill and Hillary Clinton look like Ma and Pa Kettle"

Digby on Lardass, Julieannie, "family values", and racial bias. A good read.

[...] Many social conservatives are phonies, and the rest are willing dupes. I'm not sure why people are still surprised by this. How many diaper wearing wingnut senators and teenage boy-chasing conservative congressmen does it take to prove that the whole family values campaign was just another market tested bludgeon with which to hit liberals over the head?

The truth is that "family values" for the most part is just a phrase certain tribal conservatives use to assert their moral superiority over the rest of us, probably in an attempt to deflect the fact that they are, at heart, cruel bigoted small-minded jerks. And there is no more cruel, bigoted, small-minded jerk than Rudy Giuliani, the poster boy for the newly pragmatic Republican Party. (You remember the Republicans, don't you? The party that lived by its principles and talked straight, unlike the terrorist loving hippies?)

Matthews and the rest of the talking heads won't touch the real reason why the allegedly religious, moralistic, family values loving far right seems to be so taken with the urban hedonist, Rudy Giuliani. But it's really not hard to figure. They recognize a kindred spirit, and it's that spirit that animates his crazy talk about terrorism too. He's all about kicking dark-skinned ass and that is an intensely appealing attribute to the GOP base. In fact, when you strip all the marketing and polling and propaganda away, that's what it's all about.

There's not much to add to that.

Oh the irony...

Ironic Times

Petraeus Reports Slow, Steady Progress in Iraq
At this rate, in forty years things will be back to way they were before war.

Chrysler Recalls 369,000 Vehicles for Brake Problems
Owners advised to approach dealership at slow speed, open door, put left foot on ground, push down hard.

(Mopping up keyboard)

Study: Altruism, Sex Activate Same Pleasure Center in Brain
Public advised to tip well when paying for sex.

Doubt Cast on Age of Robe of St. Francis of Assisi by Carbon Dating
Also by “Clearance Sale, 30% Off” tag.

Many more.

"Hotel Minnesota"

Tired of Larry "Wide Stance" Craig yet? So am I, but go see Loose Bruce riff on the old Eagles' tune. Is it just a coincidence that 'kazoo' rhymes with 'wazoo'?

A: Whatever Bush told him to say.

Will Durst on Petraeus' testimony:

Q. The General said we have raised the number of trained Iraqi security forces fighting alongside American troops. Is it a significant rise?
A. 60%. From 5 to 8.

Q. 5 to 8 brigades? Divisions?
A. No. Troops. Used to be 5 guys we could trust. Now it's 8.

Q. Doesn't the latest National Intelligence Estimate report Iraq's government is paralyzed by internal squabbling and petty personal differences?
A. Yes, so if you think about it, we have made strides in installing an American style democracy.

Q. What does the General mean when he says security gains since the surge have been "uneven."
A. "Uneven" is traditional Pentagon speak for "getting our butts handed to us on a paper plate."

Q. What about those benchmarks that were, oh, so important in January?
A. Turns out they weren't really all that important. What is important is other stuff. Stuff that looks good right now.

Q. What ever happened to "we'll step down when the Iraqis step up?"
A. Someone stole the steps.

Q. Was a timetable provided for reducing troops in Iraq?
A. Nothing clear cut. Something to do with snow and Hell.

Go read the rest. It'd be a lot funnier if it wasn't so true.

You can't do that to Sister Bertrille...

Think Progress, with video:

Fox censors Sally Field’s anti-war speech at Emmy’s.

At tonight’s Emmy Awards show, the audience cheered Sally Field’s acceptance speech, which recognized the mothers of U.S. troops. “Surely this [award] belongs to all the mothers of the world,” she stated. “May they be seen, may their work be valued and raised. Especially to the mothers who stand with an open heart and wait. Wait for their children to come home from danger, from harm’s way, and from war. I am proud to be one of those women.”

Field then continued, “If mothers ruled the world, there would be no –” But the Fox Emmycast cut off her sound and pointed the camera away from the stage, silencing the rest of her sentence: “god-damned wars in the first place.” Watch it:

Fuck you, Murdoch. And the Bush you rode in on.

Mercs: Kick rocks...

CNN

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraq's Interior Ministry has revoked the license of Blackwater USA, an American security firm whose contractors are blamed for a Sunday gunbattle in Baghdad that left eight civilians dead. The U.S. State Department said it plans to investigate what it calls a "terrible incident."

This might be an interesting development to keep an eye on. There are as many U.S. mercenaries operating in Iraq as there are actual troops, at much higher pay (thank you, taxpayers) and far less oversight, i.e. no rules of engagement and almost no chance of prosecution for misdeeds.

It remains to be deen if Bush will allow this blow to Blackwater's bottom line to stand. Iraq is their main source of employment and income and this will hurt 'em. No loss as far as I'm concerned.

My solution? Draft every last one of those mercenary sonsabitches and let 'em operate under the UCMJ at GI pay. We'll see how many of 'em are truly dedicated individuals. If they don't want to serve under those conditions, just disarm 'em and drop 'em off at a bus station in Anbar or Diyala.

Bottom line ... again

Kevin Drum cites the overwhelming reason this war will go on until sometime in '09:

... And finally, Democrats would no longer have the war as an issue to run on in 2008.


Ya think any of the Dems'll be honest about it? Neither do I. Off to work ...

The new AG ...

Do you think he won't be confirmed? Schmuck Schumer respects him and he did rule against the Bush administration a couple times. Sure, he's a Kool-Aid drinker all right. TBogg finds this little gem (link to the Weekly Standard article at TBogg's):

April 4, 2003:

"There's been a certain amount of pop sociology in America ... that the Shia can't get along with the Sunni and the Shia in Iraq just want to establish some kind of Islamic fundamentalist regime. There's almost no evidence of that at all. Iraq's always been very secular."


For those of us who live in the real world and work for a living, this is analogous to the cobra laying down for a nap with a mongoose. This fight has been going on for what, a thousand years? Yes, when the Americans arrive the Iraqis will be so overwhelmed by our awesomeness (remember 'Shock and Awe') they will put away their differences, join hands, and sing Kumbayaa.

He will soon be the highest-ranking law enforcement officer in the nation. God help us.

And for those stopping by who have been drinking whatever the Rethugs have been serving lately, the only reason Iraq was a secular nation was because Saddam disarmed the populace and ruled with an iron fist. Saddam was our hedge against the Shi'a in Iran and now that is gone. Like we say at the shop, "you can't fix stupid".

Update:

D over at LGM finds this from Michael Mukasey, AG Apparent:

Last month, Mr. Mukasey wrote an op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal in which he seemed to embrace a view shared by the administration suggesting “current institutions and statutes are not well suited” to the military effort against terrorism. He recommended that Congress intervene “to fix a strained and mismatched legal system.”


A "military effort against terrorism" is a failed policy as we've seen thanks to Osama's last release. The greatest successes in the "War on Terra" have come from excellent police work, not bombing the shit out of folks who never did anything to us in the first place.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

L'idiot, L'douchebag ...



Translation here.

Ordinary?

Blue Girl:

...

Only a dolt would use the word "ordinary" to describe a city in which armed gunmen ethnically cleanse neighborhoods, a household is lucky to receive two hours of electricity a day, and the water supply, when available, is not potable. Violence is verifyably down somewhat, but that is due to the fact that the ethnic cleansing has been, for the most part, successful, and the remaining holdouts hunker down and venture not outside, lest they encounter militias that will kill them.

...


Nobody is living an ordinary life in Iraq.

Toktong Ridge Runners

Once again, I thank Fixer for his impeccable taste in choosing masthead art. This one shows Marine mortarmen on Fox Hill in the Toktong Pass phase of the Battle of the Frozen Chosin during the Korean War. The young Jarhead is no doubt praying for a fire mission - four or five rounds outta that 81 and he could warm his hands on the tube! Kinda reminds me of home too - winter's a-comin'. My mortar's a different color, though...

Basically, the Marines were sent northwest from the Reservoir to try and link up with 8th Army who were were heading east to try and link up with the Marines. The Marines made it as far as Yudam-ni when the Chinese hit 'em too hard for them to proceed. The Toktong Pass was the MSR and the only route to or from Hagaru-ri where most of the 1st Marine Division was located. Fox Co., 7th Marines held the pass so they wouldn't be cut off by the Chinese.

I found some photos of the Toktong Pass immersion gallery at the National Museum of the Marine Corps, and from another account of the museum display:

Beyond the atrium, visitors face combat.

In Korea's Chosin Reservoir, 250 men of the Fox Company hunkered along the icy Toktong Pass supply route, spending five days defending it from Chinese soldiers, said retired Col. Joseph Alexander, a Marines historian from Asheville, N.C., who consulted for the museum and wrote some 800 captions for the exhibits.

Half the men of Fox Company were killed.

To fully explain that standoff, the museum would have to import piles of dead bodies, plunge the temperature to 20 below zero, invoke frostbite in its visitors and keep them awake for days in foxholes, overwhelmed by the stench of human waste and death.

I was going to go into more detail of the actual fight, but that quote summed it up pretty good, I think. There is no dearth of information on this battle, so you can hit the links or the google if you wish to learn more.

Verbal quagmire, administration spin, senatorial preening, numbing standoff

Daddy Frank

"Sir, I don't know, actually": The fact that America's surrogate commander in chief, David Petraeus, could not say whether the war in Iraq is making America safer was all you needed to take away from last week's festivities in Washington. Everything else was a verbal quagmire, as administration spin and senatorial preening fought to a numbing standoff.

Not that many Americans were watching. The country knew going in that the White House would win its latest campaign to stay its course of indefinitely shoveling our troops and treasure into the bottomless pit of Iraq. The only troops coming home alive or with their limbs intact in President Bush's troop "reduction" are those who were scheduled to be withdrawn by April anyway. Otherwise the president would have had to extend combat tours yet again, mobilize more reserves or bring back the draft.

I don't think Bush would dare bring back the draft on his so-called 'watch'. He'll leave that to his successor, should it be necessary, like he's doing with the rest of the messes he's created. I do not put it past him one little bit to extend tours in Iraq, call up the last of the reserves, and otherwise generally continue to wreck what's left of our military in a futile effort to keep the Iraq clusterfuck going until he's back down on his ranchette and can safely and smugly blame the defeat of his insane policies on someone - anyone - else. Just like he's always done.

[...] On cable the hearings fought for coverage with Britney Spears's latest self-immolation and the fate of Madeleine McCann, our latest JonBenet Ramsey stand-in.

General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker could grab an hour of prime television time only by slinking into the safe foxhole of Fox News, where Brit Hume chaperoned them on a gloomy, bunkerlike set before an audience of merely 1.5 million true believers. Their "Briefing for America," as Fox titled it, was all too fittingly interrupted early on for a commercial promising pharmaceutical relief from erectile dysfunction.

Add hard-on pills to God, guns, and gays. That's Bush's and Fixed Noise's base, all right. If ya can't fuck, ya can always fuck over someone to make up for it. Take the damn pills. Good luck tryin' to find someone who'll screw for you. The Repugs definitely need a screwin' of some type.

Mr. Bush, confident that he got away with repackaging the same bankrupt policies with a nonsensical new slogan ("Return on Success") Thursday night, is counting on the public's continued apathy as he kicks the can down the road and bides his time until Jan. 20, 2009; he, after all, has nothing more to lose. The job for real leaders is to wake up America to the urgent reality. We can't afford to punt until Inauguration Day in a war that each day drains America of resources and will. Our national security can't be held hostage indefinitely to a president's narcissistic need to compound his errors rather than admit them.


Bush loves 'freedom' or so he says. Well, he's got it:

"Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose"

Bush may not have anything left to lose politically, but our troops and the Iraqis sure do. Thanks to that punk, we all lose.

This changes the subject a little but I couldn't resist paraphrasing Me & Bobby McGee a little bit since I was already thinking about it:

"Georgie dumbed his cabinet down just before it rained,
Rode us all the way to New Orleans"


Sorry 'bout that. Go read the rest of Pop's op-ed.

Hungry croc ...

A great allegory from Strange Maps:


Click to embiggen.

Bottom line ...

Thers says all that needs to be said (and the Mets references are spot on too):

...

It’s a simple thing. This war is deeply unpopular because most Americans don’t think all the death has been worth it ...

This war will become glorious and popular again at exactly the same moment when all the corpses arise from their graves. And not a moment before ...


As soon as the Dems realize this we can start the endgame.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Rethug Club ...


Pic thanks to the Cheezburger. Click to embiggen.


Dr. Attaturk explains.

Our Nuremberg ...

EC writes what I feel:

Iraq is a crime scene --Bush's crime scene where the evidence against him is found. A war of naked aggression, what Bush did to Iraq is a capital crime under US Codes, prohibited by the Nuremberg Principles which loom like a specter over his criminal administration. Nuremberg remains the most effective and damning indictment of anyone who would hijack the apparatus of state to wage wars of aggression or to perpetrate mass murder and/or torture under the cover of a national sovereignty.

...


It's time for our own Nuremberg, whether they impeach Bush/Cheney or proffer charges once they're out of office, it could be our only hope to rehabilitate whatever credibility we might have left.

They write letters ...

Laury writes to the Chimp:

Dear Mr President (Bush)

Many of us citizens of the Middle East are fed up with the unbearable, crazy, absurd, ridiculous, bizarre situation in our region ...


You don't think everybody over there wants to blow themselves up for Allah, do you?

...

Us, Mr President are practical dreamers from every corner of the Middle East that are doing everything they can, and are using every mean[s] available to create some kind of a peaceful environment ...


As I've said before many times, after having lived on four continents, interacting with the locals, I've found one truism. People are more the same than different. They want the same things. Peace, security, a decent job, and more opportunities for their kids than they themselves were offered.

36 33

Think Progress

In his Iraq speech last night, President Bush took a moment to thank “the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in Iraq.” TPMmuckraker’s Spencer Ackerman has been counting coalition members with troops on the ground and has been able to find only 34 — many of whom have just a minor presence in Iraq. In his search, Ackerman discovered that the total is about to drop to 33: Next month, Iceland is pulling out its one lone soldier.

I'm glad he gets to go home, but it makes me wonder what the poor sonofabitch did to get sent to that shithole, and also just what the fuck Iceland thought one soldier could do to help. Maybe it was just to get subsidies from Bush for being part of the 'coalition'. I hope they kick some of it down to him. Fat chance.

A booty like a freshly-made bunk...

From The Gist about Condilieza Rice:

After she became secretary of state, she came to a party at Blacker's house, kicked off her shoes, and began dancing through the night to rock and and roll. Blacker, who is gay, wanted to show his partner how tight her behind is; he postulated that if he aimed a quarter at her butt, it would bounce off like a rocket. He was right. Rice, who was dancing, didn't realize what he had done until everyone began laughing hysterically. She was flattered -- and proud.

Makes me wonder if a pallet of quarters would bounce off Bush's head...

Iraq, deep in your bones

From deep inside an undisclosed location at the EssEffChron, Matk Morford with today's 'must read' about Iraq. It's so good I present it here in toto, and, no, that doesn't mean it's up Dorothy's dog's ass. More like up Bush's.

[A war that isn't really a war, the great humiliation that's ours forever. Is there any upside?]

No.

[We are, of course, mostly fighting against ourselves.

It must be repeated every so often, just as a painful, necessary, ego-tweaking reminder: Iraq was never a war. Not really, not in any sense that mattered or that we could actually define and understand or to which we could truly submit ourselves or our national identity.

It never mattered how many little American flags appeared on how many bloated Chevy Avalanches, how many right-wing radio shows found a new reason to pule, how many furiously blindered uber-patriots happily ignored all the harsh words from all those naysaying generals or even all the "turncoat" anti-war Republicans and insisted we're really over there to fight some sort of great Islamic demon no one can actually see or locate or define but that we must, somehow, attempt to destroy -- even though doing so only seems to make the situation far, far worse.

There was never any coherent, justifiable heroic cause. Indeed, the truth about Iraq, as evidenced by Gen. David Petreaus' muted, bleak testimony before Congress just this week, is much more simple, nefarious, pathetic. Iraq is, was, and forever will be our very own massive strategic blunder, a failed land grab for position and power in a tinderbox region defined by furious instability and corruption and death.

It's the great unspoken subtext. Iraq has always been a war between our dueling national identities, a battle over how we are to move and breathe and behave in the new millennium. Are we really this violently paranoid bully, this rogue pre-emptive screw-em-all ideological war machine defined by the dystopian Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld vision of permanent, ongoing global conflict?

Or do we try, instead, to move forward and reinvent ourselves over and over again as the world's most commited, forceful peacekeeper, ever striving for balance and cooperation and tact, even in the face of hardship and fundamentalist rage, refusing to be taunted and dragged down lest we take the bait and lose our minds and engage in torture and misprision and ultraviolence and become little better, ideologically speaking, than our taunters? Have we already made our choice?

Because the truth is, we are well past the point of salvaging anything noble or honest from Bush's massive, historic debacle. We have only this brutal reality: Iraq is, and forever will be, one of the most extraordinary wastes in all of American history.

A waste of money. A waste of time. A stunning, almost unspeakable waste of life. A waste of resources and intellectual capital and a massive waste of national spirit. A waste of energy and hope and a giant squandering of any goodwill or empathy our former allies might've had for America in its post-9/11 state. Heard it all before? Sure you have.

Some scenes remain almost comical in their absurdity. Perhaps you saw that money, those enormous, ridiculous piles of American cash, the photos floating around of American soldiers guarding giant, shrink-wrapped pallets of U.S. currency known as "cashpaks," each reportedly containing about $1.6 million in stacks of $100 bills, all airlifted by the ton straight from the Federal Reserve and set down in the Iraqi sun like rotting fruit, small mountains of your tax dollars earmarked to buy off various warlords and pay for covert, unauthorized operations all over the Middle East in an attempt to buy our way into some sort of impossible, forced stability. Right.

Or maybe it's the bodies, the sheer waste of American flesh, not merely the thousands of U.S. dead or even the countless tens of thousands of dead Iraqi citizens but also the lesser-known horrors, like the epidemic of brain-damaged U.S. soldiers, thousands of them, so many that they're becoming their own category of study in medical textbooks given how they're beginning to exhibit combinations of trauma doctors have never seen before.

What a recruitment poster this is. Come fight in the American military. We're exhausted, overstretched, bewildered, have lowered our entrance barrier to accept D-grade students and former inmates, have almost zero idea what we're actually fighting for, and serve under a Commander in Chief who cares more about trying to shore up his wretched legacy than for the loss of American life. Oh and by the way, odds are extremely high you will return home permanently wounded, traumatized, or brain damaged. How very proud we are.

We all know the current reality: We are not safer. We are not better off in any measurable way. We are not stronger or more unified or prouder or more respected or healthier or wealthier or wiser and we have done exactly zero to stem the flood of radical Islam or the general outpouring of global disgust at what America has become under this president. This is our scar. This is our great American shame.

So, what do you do with it? Or with the prospect of still more weeks, months, even years of this dull slog of war? Because the fact is, as Petreaus' testimony essentially confirmed, we will be in Iraq at least through the (blessed) end of Bush's nightmare term, and likely well beyond, given how entrenched and ensnared our forces have become.

Perhaps we can take the long view, the wide view, the spiritual or karmic view, even, insofar as the short and linear view has become so stifling and deadly and useless. Perhaps this is the only way.

Because truly, many in the alternative set, the lightworkers and the gurus and the healers and the deep teachers, those who think outside the war room and beyond the bland academic platitudes, these people tend see Iraq, BushCo, the American right and all the sanctimonious bleakness surrounding them as merely the inky remnants of a passing disease, the last, vicious gasp of a dying ideology, the violent struggle of resistance that always erupts before any great cosmic shift.

Which is to say: The screeching of the Christian right, the shrill alarmism from cultural conservatives regarding everything from sex and drugs and music to gays and nipples and creationism, the rejection of science, the attacks on women's rights, the abuse of the environment, all the way up to the bleakest and ugliest manisfestation of all, a brutal and unwinnable war -- taken as a whole, these can, if you so choose, be seen as merely the embers of a hugely failed -- and yes, nearly extinct -- worldview.

Here is the hesitant optimism, the hint of the new, the tentative suggestion that all is not lost: By many measures, the worst of it is over. There really is light coming, a new awareness, a shift away from the bleakness and the rot and the wallowing in bland violence. Perhaps you can feel it. Or perhaps you need to be ready to feel it. Either way, it's there. You have but to do the most easy/difficult thing of all: you must look behind the veil, see the two dueling Americas, and make your choice.]

I'm 'hesitantly optimistic' about Iraq the same way I'm optimistic about the aftermath of a car crash: If we survive the impact, perhaps the injuries will heal over time. Maybe we'll just be crippled for life.

Housekeeping ...

I'm gonna be doing some major blogroll maintenance this weekend. If I haven't linked you and you feel it's an injustice or feel that I'm just a 'no short term memory pothead' and I forgot, drop me an email or leave a link in comments and I'll be happy to. Conservatives need not apply.

And while I'm maintaining, the Uniform of the Day will change to Woodland Digital for the fall.

Saturday whorage

The last chapter of my novel The Fourth Estate is up at The Practical Press. Please don't forget to vote on which story I should post next. Also, if you're interested, my previous story The Captains is still available.

Whore your own in comments if you wish.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Quote of the Day

Our pal Creature:

...

The president is not delusional, he is lying.

Why ...

Don't they listen to us? Or, The Beltway Three-Step. The Fabulous Mr. Greenwald has a great post up looking up our "blathering" punditocracy:

...

And on and on. Everything they said in unison was completely false. And they do not even have the defense that it was difficult back then to see that it was false. Go read what virtually every blogger was saying back in May and it was painfully obvious that the Establishment was both deceiving itself and deceiving the country yet again. What they fear and hate more than anything is withdrawal from Iraq because staying at least allows them to avoid their own Day of Reckoning: when they are forced to accept how disastrous was the war that they all enabled. [my em]

...


We know why the Chimp wants to drag this out. I just wonder why the press is helping him. Is it all about saving face? That went away a long time ago and the shit stains have become permanent.

Nice try ...



Click to see the whole strip. Great thanks to SP @ C&L for the link.

Potomac Pinocchio

Clicking won't help this time


A tip o' the Brain to Politics Plus.

Surge 'n Stab

Good name for a cocktail, huh? Paul Krugman with today's 'must read':

To understand what’s really happening in Iraq, follow the oil money, which already knows that the surge has failed.

Now here’s the thing: Ray L. Hunt, the chief executive and president of Hunt Oil, is a close political ally of Mr. Bush. More than that, Mr. Hunt is a member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, a key oversight body.

Some commentators have expressed surprise at the fact that a businessman with very close ties to the White House is undermining U.S. policy. But that isn’t all that surprising, given this administration’s history. Remember, Halliburton was still signing business deals with Iran years after Mr. Bush declared Iran a member of the “axis of evil.”

No, what’s interesting about this deal is the fact that Mr. Hunt, thanks to his policy position, is presumably as well-informed about the actual state of affairs in Iraq as anyone in the business world can be. By putting his money into a deal with the Kurds, despite Baghdad’s disapproval, he’s essentially betting that the Iraqi government — which hasn’t met a single one of the major benchmarks Mr. Bush laid out in January — won’t get its act together. Indeed, he’s effectively betting against the survival of Iraq as a nation in any meaningful sense of the term.

The smart money, then, knows that the surge has failed, that the war is lost, and that Iraq is going the way of Yugoslavia. And I suspect that most people in the Bush administration — maybe even Mr. Bush himself — know this, too.

Shorter: Bush's bros are going around him and his failed policy to get theirs.

Here’s how I see it: At this point, Mr. Bush is looking forward to replaying the political aftermath of Vietnam, in which the right wing eventually achieved a rewriting of history that would have made George Orwell proud, convincing millions of Americans that our soldiers had victory in their grasp but were stabbed in the back by the peaceniks back home.

What all this means is that the next president, even as he or she tries to extricate us from Iraq — and prevent the country’s breakup from turning into a regional war — will have to deal with constant sniping from the people who lied us into an unnecessary war, then lost the war they started, but will never, ever, take responsibility for their failures.

Please read the rest. See also Dolchstoss Republicans.

Drawdown

Click to embiggen

This is why we'll never leave ...

Because you know we're only there for one reason:

BAGHDAD, Sept. 12 — A carefully constructed compromise on a draft law governing Iraq’s rich oil fields, agreed to in February after months of arduous talks among Iraqi political groups, appears to have collapsed. The apparent breakdown comes just as Congress and the White House are struggling to find evidence that there is progress toward reconciliation and a functioning government here.

...


Because, you know, the people of the region have seen how we've exploited them shared their oil for the last century. They've seen how our policies have empowered dictators and robber barons enlightened leaders to govern the region.

...

The oil law — which would govern how oil fields are developed and managed — is one of several benchmarks that the Bush administration has been pressing the Iraqis to meet as a sign that they are making headway toward creating an effective government.

...


Of course it's one of the demands benchmarks the Chimp has insisted on to assure Iraq is a 'democracy'. It's obvious as we see how big corporations suck the capital from our fleeting democracy make the standard of living in our model democracy so high.

Pay no attention to the demands for withdrawal. We're staying until we suck every drop of oil out from under the sand are assured the Iraqis have a working democracy so Halliburton, Exxon/Mobil the Iraqi people can experience how it feels to be fucked dry by the super rich who need more of our money to prolong their lifestyle the benefits of a democratic republic, just as we have over the past 6 years.

Fuck going home. The lives of our troops and innocent Iraqis mean nothing compared to the profits to be realized by stealing the oil are a small price to pay to assure an American hegemony freedom and democracy in the Middle East.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Petraeus tries to un-step on weenie...

An Offer He Couldn't Refuse?



Talking Points Memo:

Remember that unrehearsed flash of candor where Gen. Petraeus said he didn't know whether being in Iraq was making America safer? And then later he 'set the record straight'?

Joe Klein told Chris Matthews that he thought that during the recess in testimony Petraeus got an angry call from the White House telling him to set the record straight. Take a look ...

It sounds like this was an inference on Klein's part. But it sounds like a sound one.

No shit.

Holidays ...

Over to the in-laws for Rosh Hashanah. Happy New Year 5768.

Troop Reduction

Click to un-reduce


Via Slate.

The Ultimate GOP Scandal: Bush Caught In A 'Stall' With A Male Prostitute

SPR
Quit 'stalling'. Click it.


"Sounds like we'll be playing 'Taps' for a long, long time."

Can Rep. McHenry's Hostel for Strapping Young Republican Lads survive this?

Go read Jesus' General's letter to Mitch McConnell. Liquid alert.

I'm going to be blunt. By buying into the libislamunistfascist spin about Larry Craig being a homosexual, you are destroying the party's ability to retake the Senate for decades to come. Larry Craig is not a homosexual. He's told us that. He's just as heterosexual as you and Lindsey Graham. You shouldn't have tried to force him to resign. He deserved to be treated the same way you treated Sen. Vitter, who admitted to breaking the law by paying a harlot to change his diaper--that is to say, you should have given Sen. Craig your full support.

I understand that after hearing stories about Sen. Craig sucking anonymous little soldiers in restrooms across this great nation, it's easy to jump to the conclusion that he might be dancing with Dorothy. But think about it. Isn't it just as likely that this very heterosexual married man was looking for something his wife was unable to provide for him: a hot, throbbing slab of hard salami to swallow? We've all been there haven't we? We want something that our wives can't give, so we exercise our patriarchal privilege to get it elsewhere.

But now that you've adopted the Democratic frame that such behavior is homosexual in nature, you've jeopardized the careers of a lot of good, anti-homosexual politicians who are also rumored to be looking outside their marriage for a little sausage slurping action, good men like Sen. Lindsey Graham, Representatives David Dreier and Patrick McHenry, and even yourself.

Do we know if JC Christian is just Rude Pundit with his collar on backwards?

What all has Bush done in office you ask...

Go see the list of his accomplishments at Funny Cracker. It's longer than you might think, and it's good to see them all at once.

CentCom Speaks

Think Progress

In January, President Bush replaced Abizaid and Casey, who were “surge” skeptics, with Adm. William Fallon and Gen. David Petraeus. This week, Petraeus — in the first public hearings since taking on his new role — delivered his Iraq assessment to great media fanfare. But where was his boss, Admiral Fallon? Inter-Press Service suggests animosity between the two might be one reason for Fallon’s absence:

Fallon told Petraeus [in March] that he considered him to be “an ass-kissing little chickensh*t” and added, “I hate people like that”, the sources say. That remark reportedly came after Petraeus began the meeting by making remarks that Fallon interpreted as trying to ingratiate himself with a superior.


The Washington Post reported this weekend that there is an internal military debate, described as “Armageddon,” brewing between Petraeus and Fallon because the two men have “profoundly different views of the U.S. role in Iraq.”

It's rare to hear one Flag diss another one. I fuckin' love it! Go get 'em, Sailor!

In related news, rumor has it that Admiral Fallon will be transferred next week to command of the East River Garbage Scow Fleet...

Go read. Many links and quotes from Sen. Webb.

Spine, anyone?

Tristero looks at the Chimp's likely choice as the new AG nominee. Harry Reid is talking big, but personally, I think this nomination will follow the same script as the SCOTUS appointments:

...

Let me put it this way. While countrywide disgust with Bush, Bushism, and the low-brow pandering of Republican shtick is, perhaps, at an all-time high, one should never misunderestimate the Democrats' remarkable skill at pulling the rabbit of defeat out of the most victorious of hats (or something like that).

...


Indeed. One way or another, the next AG will be another in a line of thuggish, jackbooted, brownshirted, fascist administrators.

... If Olson is indeed the nominee, how he fares should be considered a decent harbinger for 2008. If they confirm him, hang on to that hat: It means that the top Dems have learned nothing and '08 is seriously up for grabs. But if the Dems can manage not merely to defeat Olson, but expose the extremism that he - and by extension, the Republican Party - embodies, well, that's a different story ...


T seems to have a bit of hope the Dems might be able to win one but if past performance is an indicator, I don't. Using the past as a guide, I think whoever gets the Chimp's nomination will be confirmed without much hubbub. I'm pretty much resigned to the status quo until the '08 elections are over.

[tinfoil hat]

By the way, you know when the next terror attack on U.S. soil will happen? In the time between Election and Inauguration Days next year. Think 'national emergency' and 'war powers'. Think President Cheney.

[/tinfoil hat]

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Idea for a 'Stocking Stuffers'!

Now, as I am considered 'in recovery' (12 years) I've not signed up for the local "Drinking Liberally" chapter. But look what the Idaho Falls chapter of 'Drinking Liberally' has come up with! There's even a little bit of a shop at Cafe Press. Coasters, doorhangers, etc. Whacha think?

craig-thumb.jpg

Quote of the Day

Shakes:

...

#@$*&^#&$*&#@$*&^#&$*&#@$*&^#&$*&!!!

...

Trench Warfare

John Ridley at HuffPo

The First World War was, of course, famous for trench warfare. A protracted stalemate rather than a series of decisive battles. The politicians and monarchs were mostly content to "let it bleed" rather than be innovate enough to bring the war to a military or diplomatic end.

We are once again in trench warfare.

Since the president's troop surge in Iraq began this past February, we have all waited like gimps in an infirmary for General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker to descend from Mount Iraq. Toting, we hoped, stone tablets with directives with which to lead us to the Promised Land.

No such luck.

Well, our men and women in uniform remain stuck in their trenches.

Petraeus says the 30,000 "surge" troops should stay in place until at least next July. Nearly 120,000 will remain in Iraq for the foreseeable future.

The foreseeable future being the next decade.

And the war goes on.

Settle in, folks. It's likely to be quite the wait before our Armistice day.

The First World War analogy is apt. That conflict was entirely unnecessary, a massive over-reaction to a single pistol shot.

It brought down empires and slaughtered an entire generation of young men. Over nothing. It also led directly to World War Two and what's going on in the Middle East today.

Got any ideas as to which 'empire' is going to fall this time? Over a buncha lies.

Imperial Autism

TomDispatch

To grasp the Petraeus moment, you really have to re-imagine official Washington as a set of drunks behind the wheels of so many SUVs tearing down a well-populated city avenue -- and all of them are on their cell phones. They hardly notice the bodies bouncing off the fenders. For them, the world is Washington-centered; all interests that matter are American ones. Nothing else exists, not really. Think of this as a form of imperial autism and the Petraeus moment as the way in which the White House and official Washington have, for a brief time, blotted out the world.

The world will still be there when if they ever sober up or run out of gas or hit a phone pole, but they're experts at ignoring reality. it's in their best interests, if not ours or the world's.

"...they stopped short of lying."

Slate

Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, and his fellow witness, Ambassador Ryan Crocker, did their best all day and yesterday to put the most hopeful face on the grimness before them. But, to their credit, they stopped short of lying (my em).

Wow. That's something new for this administration. I bet Bush hopes it ain't catchin'.

Republican Sen. John McCain, one of the committee's more hawkish members, asked Crocker what degree of confidence he had that the leaders of the Iraqi government will take the steps toward political reconciliation that they've promised to take.

Crocker hesitated, then replied, "My level of confidence is under control."

That's a very understated way of saying "They'll reconcile when pigs fly".

In one sense, today's hearings dealt President George W. Bush a harsh blow. Many of the senators' questions dealt with strategic issues, which Petraeus and Crocker—through no fault of their own—could not really answer to anyone's full satisfaction. Even the vast majority of Republican senators at least cocked their eyebrows.

Nearly all the senators seemed to recognize that the few, much-vaunted successes—especially in Anbar province, where Sunni tribes have joined with U.S. forces to defeat al-Qaida terrorists—have little to do with the main issues of this war: sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites and the failure of the central government to mediate, much less settle, those conflicts. As Richard Lugar, the foreign relations committee's ranking Republican put it, "The progress may be beside the point." The U.S. troops may be "like a farmer planting crops on flood plains."

Bush is certainly providing enough fertilizer, but the deluge is coming.

Tell us what you've been told to tell us, General...

Click to inflate

"I don't know, actually."

p m carpenter

As it turned out, there was some educational value in Gen. David Petraeus' testimony before Congress and the American people after all.

It seems he doesn't believe in his mission.

When asked yesterday by Republican Sen. John Warner if all the expense in American lives and treasure is "making America safer" -- which is, of course, presupposed as the objective of any military mission -- the general first hummed, hawed and outright dodged the question by musing about his current focus on "achiev[ing] our objectives in Iraq."

Undeterred, the senator put it to the general again: But is it making America safer?

To which the general said: "Sir, I don't know, actually."

With that, Petraeus not only wandered off the reservation, he bolted. One could almost hear the sundry and panicked hearts being clutched in the White House. The mask was off their #1 guy; their p.r. extravaganza was now a bare-faced debacle.

The Nation

Did General David Petraeus today suggest that the war in Iraq may not make the United States safer?

Petraeus replied, "I don't know, actually. I have not sat down and sorted in my own mind."

Don't know? Is it possible that the war is not making the United States safer? Petraeus went on to note that he has "taken into account" the war's impact on the U.S. military and that it's his job to recommend to the president the best course for reaching "the objectives of the policy" in Iraq. Yet he did not say that the Iraq war is essential to the national security of the United States. Warner did not press the general any further on this point. The senator's time was up.

That was quite a statement from the fellow who is supposed to save Bush's war. He advocates pursuing Bush's course of action in Iraq but he cannot attest that this effort is crucial for America's safety. Is that being a good soldier?

If he's nothing else, General Petraeus is a good soldier. Soldiers follow orders, whether they like them or not, for good or for ill. Petraeus has been ordered to put lipstick on Bush's pig and he's doing it rather well.

When pressed, a good soldier will tell the truth, even when it puts a tiny crack in the propaganda he's been ordered to spew in support of his masters' delusions. A worse hack would have answered the question with a slightly different 'four words': "Of course it is!"

I've seen the massive rear fender on a Harley-Davidson fall off because a tiny, nearly invisible crack was left unchecked and allowed to propagate.

It remains to be seen what will happen because of Petraeus' comment, but some of the pundits have already picked it up and are trying to run with it. I can only imagine that the Chimp ain't none too happy about this and will do his best to 'stop-drill' it, something along the lines of, "The general fights wars and does my military bidding. I'll tell you when you're safe."

I hope the crack spreads and Bush's ass falls off and gets drop-kicked through the goalpost of truth.

I may have just set a new standard for mixed metaphors with a motorcycle/sports/Bush's ass one. Heh.

Location, location, location...

Mrs. F's company pays $2.6 mil per floor (they occupy the top two of the Merrill Lynch Building) per year in rent. Some of the rents in WTC were twice that. That's why we're gonna have the Freedom Tower soon enough. - Fixer in comments on yesterday's post


Anna Quindlen riffs on Fixer's comment:

It's all there at the construction site. Tourists peer through the fence, but it's hard to understand what they think they're seeing. Everything that once spoke of the magnitude of the events of September 11 is gone. As much as its jagged smoking ruins were once a symbol for unparalleled disaster, now its bland expanse is a symbol of how narrow and parsimonious the long-term response has been. It's business as usual there, except for one small section of the fence with a listing of the names of those who died in letters so small that you almost have to squint to read them. Remember how we said we would never forget them? We forgot them. If the spirit of the day had prevailed, the sense that this was a moment like no other and demanded a gesture in kind, someone would have had the guts to leave this national graveyard solemn, empty and still. Instead there is a sign there that says that the job now is "to recover the 10 million-sq. feet of commercial space lost in the attacks." How American. It's all about the real estate.

Yep.

They work for us ...

TRex makes the case for term limits, which I heartily endorse:

...

Stevens and Lieberman and Craig are all pretty sterling arguments for senatorial term limits if you ask me. Letting those old farts moulder in place for thirty-plus years hasn’t done them or the nation any goddamn good at all, frankly. And if we can’t get term limits, can we at least get a minimum competency test? Ugly and old is fine for a Senate position, but I think we can all agree that “senile, belligerent, and delusional” should disqualify them from higher office.

...


Like I always say, elected office is a calling, not a career. To many of 'em lose touch with those whom they are supposed to be representing, protecting big campaign contributors at the expense of their constituency. 2 terms for Senators, 6 terms for Representatives should be the rule, not a pipe dream.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

3-Day Wait For Hallucinations

Raw Story

A new proposal from the mayor of Amsterdam is sure to be considered a bummer by certain visitors to the Dutch city: a three-day waiting period to buy hallucinogenic mushrooms.

Like, bummer, dude. Dutch heads gotta plan ahead now. Good luck.

Mayor Job Cohen wants to require the wait period to allow mushroom buyers to fully understand exactly what it is they are purchasing, ANP news agency reported Tuesday.

Yo, Job, they know.

I ate some of them things once at a bluegrass concert at San Diego Wild Animal Park. Rode on an elephant. It was way cool.

Then the sun went down and all the nocturnal animals, big cats mostly, started sounding off. That was really cool, but I had to keep reminding my friends that the animals weren't coming for them. Heh.

The 130-mile drive home afterwards must have been interesting. I don't remember. I was driving.

Bin Laden's Bobbed Black Beard Baffles Boob

Times of India

WASHINGTON: Osama bin Laden's beard seen in a new video tape featuring the Al-Qaeda supremo has baffled the top US spy.

It's hair growing out of his face, you fucking idiot.

September 11: What You "Ought Not To Know"

Greg Palast with today's 'must read':

On November 9, 2001, when you could still choke on the dust in the air near Ground Zero, BBC Television received a call in London from a top-level US intelligence agent. He was not happy. Shortly after George W. Bush took office, he told us reluctantly, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the FBI, “were told to back off the Saudis.”

Before you jump to the wrong conclusion, let me tell you that we found no evidence — none, zero, no kidding — that George Bush knew about Al Qaeda’s plan to attack on September 11. Indeed, the grim joke at BBC is that anyone accusing George Bush of knowing anything at all must have solid evidence (my em). This is not a story of what George Bush knew but rather of his very-unfunny ignorance. And it was not stupidity, but policy: no asking Saudis uncomfortable questions about their paying off roving packs of killers, especially when those Saudis are so generous to Bush family businesses.

Yes, Bill Clinton was also a bit too tender toward the oil men of Arabia. But this you should know: In his last year in office, Clinton sent two delegations to the Gulf to suggest that the Royal family crack down on “charitable donations” from their kingdom to the guys who blew up our embassies.

But when a failed Texas oil man took over the White House in January 2001, demands on the Saudis to cut off terror funding simply stopped.

Why now this belated move on the bin Laden’s former operation? Why not right after the September 11 attack? This year’s FBI raid occurred just days after an Islamist terror assault in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Apparently, messin’ with the oil sheiks gets this Administration’s attention. Falling towers in New York are only for Republican convention photo ops.

The 199-I memo was passed to BBC television by the gumshoes at the National Security News Service in Washington. We authenticated it, added in our own sleuthing, then gave the FBI its say, expecting the usual, “It’s baloney, a fake.” But we didn’t get the usual response. Rather, FBI headquarters said, “There are lots of things the intelligence community knows and other people ought not to know.”

Ought not to know?

What else ought we not to know, Mr. President? And when are we supposed to forget it?

I'm angry enough at this that I dare not comment any further.

Bark, woof, whinny-whinny, neigh-neigh

Click for an even bigger pair of road apples

Here's what some folks are sayimg about General Petraeus' appearance before Congress:

Ray McGovern, a good one to read:

"Swear Him In"

That's all I said in the unusual silence on Monday afternoon as first aid was being administered to Gen. David Petraeus's microphone before he spoke before the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs Committees.

It had dawned on me when House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Missouri) invited Gen. Petraeus to make his presentation, Skelton forgot to ask him to take the customary oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I had no idea my suggestion would be enough to get me thrown out of he hearing.

TPM Election Central

Bottom line: The public appears to have decided that Petraeus won't tell them the truth about Iraq, that they want out of Iraq no matter what he says, and that the President won't change course in the wake of his testimony. Clever public.

Like it matters what us pissants think.

Tony Peyser

Let’s frame this in a way
That’s easy to remember:
What the general means is
Spring is the new September.

Eugene Robinson

The next six months in Iraq are crucial -- and always will be. [...]

That's pretty much it. Petraeus is selling a product he has a stake in, and doing a damn good job of it. He will get Bush And His Iraq Clusterfuck another Friedman Unit per his orders to that effect, and, oh yeah, Super-Size it. FUs are getting longer so they don't have to do this song and dance every six months. Once more oughta do it for Bush's term.

The concern that comes to mind is this: as these reports get rosier and rosier, what if Bush thinks that he's the only one who can get the oil carry out the Iraq 'mission' (as in missionary), that no succeeding Repuglicant president can do it, and for damn sure no Democrat ever could, and just decides to stay King until he can do it? He can't, of course.

We're in Iraq full force until at least 1/09. Period. The best we can hope for is that Bush and Cheney die before then.

Counterpoint ...

To JG's "Then", my "Now". The Towers would be directly behind the World Financial Center in this view. By the way, Mrs. F's office is on the top floor of the building with the dome.


Taken from MS Noordam. Click to embiggen.


May they rest in peace ... sooner rather than later.

Betrayed

Yesterday, in front of Congress, we saw the American people, the troops, and the Constitution betrayed by the commanding general in Iraq. I won't bother picking apart what he said, the lies he spread, but suffice it to say the truth never entered the room yesterday. Glenn Greenwald says it best:

...

It is actually amazing to watch media coverage of Gen. Petraeus' testimony depict him as though he has just risen from the apolitical ether as the objective and trustworthy source with regard to the war. The White House is desperate for that image to be maintained because the nation no longer trusts George Bush or Dick Cheney or other Republican office-holders, precisely because they have heard from those individuals over the last several years countless assurances of "progress," only for events repeatedly to prove those claims to be untrue.

...


On this sixth anniversary of September 11th, nothing has changed. We are not safer, our government still lies to us, and thousands of Americans are still being killed and maimed.

The sad part is we will be stuck with this until at least January 2009.

9.11.2007.New.York.State.of.Mind

New York State of Mind
Click image to view larger version.

Peace!
JG.


Cross posted at: Jersey Guy

Monday, September 10, 2007

The 'Surge Report'


Dog and Pony Show courtesy of FDL.

Quote of the Day and then some...

From Think Progress, a comment on the post about David Brooks trying to associate bin Laden with Liberals:

From Bush to Brooks, Osama bin Laden knows how to play his useful idiots.

Note to Brooks et al: OBL's a lot more symbiotically useful to you wingnuts than he is to us, which is why you haven't pursued him like you should have. You're the ones who turned his sucker punch on us into an excuse to abrogate the Constitution and plunge the United States into international criminality. Go fuck yourself. And that Texas mule you rode in on.

Update:

Robert Parry

Just as Sylvester and Tweety Bird achieved lasting Hollywood fame from their comical cartoon chases, the less amusing duo of George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden continue to benefit each other by reviving their long-distance rivalry, one posturing against the other in a way that helps them both.

“The vast majority of you [Americans] want it [the Iraq War] stopped,” bin Laden said. “Thus you elected the Democratic Party for this purpose, but the Democrats haven't made a move worth mentioning.”

That means if the Democrats do renew their efforts toward forcing American troop withdrawals, Bush and his supporters can simply accuse the Democrats of following bin Laden’s orders or playing into bin Laden’s hands.

The reality may be the opposite, but a few Republican floor speeches and a couple of well-placed op-eds should be enough to spook the already nervous Democrats.

In other words, any similarity in language between bin Laden and what many Americans say in common conversations will be used to discredit them. They will become bin Laden’s fellow travelers.

All the better to get Bush and bin Laden what they both really want: a prolonged war in Iraq – and possibly a U.S. attack on the Shiite government of Iran.

There you have it.

Janis Martin 1940-2007

LATimes

Janis Martin, a teenage rockabilly sensation of the 1950s who was billed as "the female Elvis," died Sept. 3 of cancer at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C. She was 67.

I was pretty young way back then, but I liked Rockabilly. Still do. I probably heard her sing, but I was never really conscious of Ms. Martin until recently, when I saw a TV show about "The Women of Rockabilly". This gal was a pistol.

You can hear her and some of the other Rockabilly gals of that era here. Man, them broads got some pipes!

Read more about her here.

Left-wing brain, Right-wing...brain?

According to this article in the LATimes, apparently wingnuts do have a large organic mass in their brain housing groups, even if its only function is to hold their ears apart.

In a simple experiment reported todayin the journal Nature Neuroscience, scientists at New York University and UCLA show that political orientation is related to differences in how the brain processes information.

Previous psychological studies have found that conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments whereas liberals are more open to new experiences. The latest study found those traits are not confined to political situations but also influence everyday decisions.

The results show "there are two cognitive styles -- a liberal style and a conservative style," said UCLA neurologist Dr. Marco Iacoboni, who was not connected to the latest research.

Analyzing the data, Sulloway said liberals were 4.9 times as likely as conservatives to show activity in the brain circuits (coulda ended that sentence right there - G) that deal with conflicts, and 2.2 times as likely to score in the top half of the distribution for accuracy.

Based on the results, he said, liberals could be expected to more readily accept new social, scientific or religious ideas.

Harumph. I coulda told 'em that.

Karl Rove Spotted in Paraguay

Evan Essence

After mysteriously disappearing from public sight 2 days ago, Karl Rove has succeeded in eluding angry Democratic Congressional leaders, and flocks of bloggers with cell phone cameras. Now, there have been 3 spottings of Rove in a remote part of Paraguay.

It has been widely reported on the Internet, that George Bush purchased 99,000 acres of land in Paraguay shortly before last Fall's election, which swept away Rove's dream of a permanent Republican majority in Congress. Paraguay is in a region of the World which is traditionally safe for War Criminals.

I just had to post this to show that there's someone else out there as goofy as I am.

"Bring it on" ... revisited

We saw what happened the last time the Chimp decided to wave his weenie around and dare the 'terrists' to "bring it on". Seems it's time for some bravado again though, once again, I doubt we're prepared for the consequences:

...

I assume they thought this was very clever, having a blond American woman [Fran Townsend] insult bin Laden's manhood. (She might as well have held her thumb and forefinger up like she was measuring an inch while she said it.) I'll bet Bush snorted and snickered all afternoon. But sadly, it's probably true that some of bin Laden's followers are just as insecure about their manhood as Townsend's boss is and some poor schmoe in Afghanistan or Iraq or somewhere else willpay the ultimate price for her little taunt.

...

Sunday, September 9, 2007

Culture of Corruption

Bill Clinton, William Jefferson, Bill Clinton, William Jefferson, Bill Cli ...

Froggy links to a list of all the Rethugs in trouble.

... The list is long and very interesting. The list contains about 200 of 'em.

...

The Surge Is working

Click it

As the Iraqis Stand Down, We’ll Stand Up

Daddy Frank nails it. Today's 'must read':

It will be all 9/11 all the time this week, as the White House yet again synchronizes its drumbeating for the Iraq war with the anniversary of an attack that had nothing to do with Iraq. Ignore that fog and focus instead on another date whose anniversary passed yesterday without notice: Sept. 8, 2002. What happened on that Sunday five years ago is the Rosetta Stone for the administration's latest scam.

That was the morning when the Bush White House officially rolled out its fraudulent case for the war. [...]

What followed was an epic propaganda onslaught of distorted intelligence, fake news, credulous and erroneous reporting by bona fide journalists, presidential playacting and Congressional fecklessness. Much of it had been plotted that summer of 2002 by the then-secret White House Iraq Group (WHIG), a small task force of administration brass charged with the Iraq con job.

Today the spirit of WHIG lives. In the stay-the-surge propaganda offensive that crests with this week's Congressional testimony of Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker, history is repeating itself in almost every particular. Even the specter of imminent "nuclear holocaust" has been rebooted in President Bush's arsenal of rhetorical scare tactics.

As always with this White House, telegenic artificial realities are paramount. Exhibit A, of course, was last weekend's precisely timed "surprise" presidential junket: Mr. Bush took the measure of success "on the ground here in Anbar" (as he put it) without ever leaving a heavily fortified American base.

When the line separating spin from reality is so effectively blurred, the White House's propaganda mission has once more been accomplished. No wonder President Bush is cocky again. Stopping in Sydney for the economic summit after last weekend's photo op in Iraq, he reportedly told Australia's deputy prime minister that "we're kicking ass." This war has now gone on so long that perhaps he has forgotten the price our troops paid the last time he taunted our adversaries to bring it on, some four years and 3,500 American military fatalities ago.

Prople will continue to die for lies, spin, and propaganda for another 17 months. It's Bush's way, paying the world back for being such an inadequate, cowardly little man. God damn him.

This year ...

It's even more disgraceful. In addition to playing 9/11 for all it's worth for another year, now the memory of those who died that day will be further defiled by General "Baghdad Bob" Petraeus' "Surge Report", telling Congress how absolutely swimmingly it's going in Iraq.

It's bad enough the cable and broadcast networks will spend another day with nothing but programming from Ground Zero, once more using the corpses of innocents to further their ratings race, to further the agenda of the White House, to get Americans pissed off enough at 'the ragheads', to get Congress distracted enough, so 'business as usual' remains in Iraq.

Most Americans believe nothing will change and anything Petraeus says will be scripted by the White House. It's time to stop looking to the past and look to our future and that, my friends, is very bleak. Things have to be fixed in a big way and repeating "everything changed after 9/11" ain't gonna do it.

The exploitation of 9/11, on every level, is only stagnating this nation. The deaths of 3000 of my friends and neighbors have been exploited for everything from an illegal war in Iraq, to the obfuscation of our civil rights. I'm tired of it. Mark the day, let the dead rest in peace, and stop using it to coerce the American people to do things they know are wrong.

It's time for the Dems in Congress to stand up, call bullshit on Petraeus, and say it's time to change course now, not in a year, not in five, not in ten. September 11th was a black day in our history, let us not allow it to be the milestone historians will point to and say "this was the beginning of the end of the United States of America".